Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 4,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2013, 5:11 am
The court relied on the Ninth Circuit’s earlier decision in Rossi v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 5:43 am
District Judge Susan C. [read post]
12 May 2023, 3:00 am
On (2), one had to conduct a multifactorial assessment based on all the circumstances of the case which included the relevant factors set out by David Stone in MEI Fields Designs Ltd v Saffron Cards and Gifts Ltd [2018] EWHC 132 (IPEC) as follows: (a) the terms of the contract of employment; (b) where the work was created; (c) whether the work was created during normal office hours; (d) who provided the materials for [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:11 am
Contingent issues then arose, if section 32(2) were not so compatible (c) should s.32 be read down under s.3 Human Rights Act to be compatible, either by reading it as an exemption which (i) ceased to operate at the end of the inquiry or (ii) as a qualified exemption requiring a general balancing of competing public interests) rather than an absolute exemption;and (d) if it is not possible to interpret s.32(2) in a manner that is compatible with the Convention, whether the Supreme… [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 10:15 am
In the case, CFPB v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:58 am
Touby v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
C. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:53 am
Criteria to be applied In contrast to the Chamber, the Grand Chamber considered that the Axel Springer criteria for balancing Articles 8 and 10 (see Axel Springer v Germany [2012] ECHR 227)) were not applicable. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 8:48 am
G.S. 7A-272(d). [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 11:04 am
(c).) [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 6:50 am
See Children Act 1989, c. 41, Part II, s 8(1) ("In this Act-'a contact order' means an order requiring the person with whom a child lives, or is to live, to allow the child to visit or stay with the person named in the order, or for that person and the child otherwise to have contact with each other.... [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:50 am
State v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 7:06 am
(d) Within 90 days of receipt of the recommendations described in subsection (b) of this section, the FAR Council shall review the proposed contract language and conditions and, as appropriate, shall publish for public comment proposed updates to the FAR. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:32 am
Within Alphonse v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 8:20 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada stated in R. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 7:09 am
Roberts, Frank C. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 5:02 am
As an April post here noted, some people have been trying to get Google to deindex mainstream news articles — hide them from searchers by removing them from Google indexes — by (a) suing the people quoted in the articles, (b) getting stipulations from the people recanting their allegations, (c) getting court orders based on those recantations, and then (d) submitting those orders to Google. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 10:09 am
Las modalidades usuales de trasplantes de riñón incluyen: (a) la donación cadavérica (cuando donante acordó donar sus órganos a su fallecimiento); (b) la de donantes vivos relacionados (cuando el donante es un familiar por co-sanguineidad-i.e. hijos, hermanos, padres); (c) donantes vivos no relacionados (cuando no hay vínculo sanguíneo del donante con el recipiente-i.e. cónyuge, amigos); y (d) donantes… [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 3:18 pm
\8\ Id., para. 190(d) [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 4:13 pm
(b) The Account Statement must be distributed at least monthly in the case of pools with net assets of more than $500,000 at the beginning of the pool’s fiscal year, and otherwise at least quarterly; Provided, however, That an Account Statement for the last reporting period of the pool’s fiscal year need not be distributed if the Annual Report required by paragraph (c) of this section is sent to pool participants within 45 calendar days after the end of the fiscal year.… [read post]
