Search for: "DAVID MILLER"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 2,807
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2013, 4:30 am
Capturing Lessons of Our Failures and Successes" — David E. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
In the same-sex marriage cases that were heard and decided by the U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
In the space below, I offer some quick analysis of the U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In the space below, I continue to analyze what will—and what should—happen to California’s voter-adopted ban on same-sex marriage, Proposition 8, in the wake of the U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 10:05 pm
" Chance Miller of 9to5Mac also reported on Apple's release of a public beta. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
Gordon (Yale University) [former Stanford faculty]; Dan Hulsebosch (New York University); Mark McKenna (Notre Dame) (Fall 2010); Bernadette Meyler (Cornell) (Spring 2011); Nicholas Rosenkranz (Georgetown) (Fall 2010); William Simon (Columbia University) [emeritus, Stanford] Stetson: Diane Klein (La Verne) (2010-11); John Lenich (Nebraska) (Fall 2010); James Maxeiner (Baltimore) (Fall 2010) Texas: Aaron Bruhl (Houston) (Fall 2010); Adam Rosenzweig (Washington Univ.)… [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 5:21 am
eDiscovery News Content and Considerations A Civil Procedure Car Crash - http://tinyurl.com/4gvfvq9 (Josh Gilliland) Amendments To Expert Witness Discovery Under Federal Rule 26 - http://tinyurl.com/4spj8wx (David Lender, Kevin Meade) Businesses Head Off eDiscovery Costs – http://tinyurl.com/4kwf4fa (Jason Krause) Can You Trust Your Data? [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 5:03 am
eDiscovery News Content and Considerations A New Verdict on Jury Tweeting - http://tinyurl.com/6yylf5y (Robert McGarvey) An iPhone Left in a Locked Bathroom is Not “Abandoned” under the 4th Amendment - http://tinyurl.com/67lvn7j (Josh Gilliland) Broad Federal Court Powers Under Evidence Rule 502(d) - http://tinyurl.com/3snbeqp (Christopher Boehning, Daniel Toal) Bringing Project Management Skills to E-Discovery - http://tinyurl.com/3hnns9b (Pat McColloch) Case Blurb: Santana; Federal… [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am
David Johnston QC submits that he has, on a counsel to counsel basis, offered Kenny McBrearty QC a chance to see the Respondents’ Note of Argument. 1554: David Johnston QC submits that there are a wide range of views on the manner in which the country leaves the EU. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
As the vote tallies for the November 2018 federal elections become finalized, one seat in the House of Representatives may not be resolved for several weeks because of an unusual lawsuit filed by Republican incumbent Bruce Poliquin (along with three Republican voters) in Maine. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Town of Greece v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Amid all the drama surrounding the fiscal cliff negotiations of the last few weeks, there was an important, sad, and in some respects troubling development in the U.S. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
In what some commentators believe is one of the most important cases of the Supreme Court’s recently concluded term, Matal v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
Given that this week is the first in the Supreme Court’s new Term, it is hardly surprising that I will devote today’s column to a case on the Court’s docket this week. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Many of the essays posted on Verdict deal with Supreme Court cases; in today’s column I focus on an opinion issued by a court at the base, rather than the pinnacle, of the federal judicial system—this month’s ruling by a federal district court in Arizona disposing of residual challenges brought against Arizona’s SB 1070 statute, the statute passed in 2010 attempting to deal with immigration stresses in the state, parts of which were struck down two years later by the Supreme… [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In my column this week, I explore an important First Amendment free speech ruling handed down at the end of December by the California Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Today we analyze a very intriguing issue raised by a case that will be heard by the U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
In our two previous columns on the recent lawsuit by a Texas-based nonprofit organization—Faculty, Alumni, and Students Opposed to Racial Preferences (FASORP)—against Harvard Law Review (HLR) for its use of race and gender in selecting its members and authors for publication, we explored challenges the plaintiff faces in establishing standing to sue in federal court, the relationship of Title VI and IX (the statutory provisions the plaintiff has invoked) to the constitutional… [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
In the space below, I offer analysis of a campaign regulation case in which the U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court this week handed down its first (but almost certainly not its last) 5-4 ruling of the Term. [read post]
