Search for: "DOE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 44,299
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2024, 10:10 am
Since 2003, the U.S. government has operated a No Fly List that indefinitely bars U.S. citizens and residents from flying to, from, or over the United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
United States, No. 21-1279, 2022 WL 1231428 (Fed. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:55 am
United States, where former President Donald Trump will try to convince the U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:08 am
Referring to the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:50 am
(Particularly following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 4:05 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
If Peru does not do that, then the United States can raise the matter before a dispute settlement panel. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 3:45 am
United States [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 6:40 pm
The secretary of state, charged (under state law) with the ministerial task for forwarding the votes to Congress, does so. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:36 pm
Beyond that, the man should be allowed to fade into history and the United States should move on. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:02 pm
In Wood v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:15 am
United States (Feb. 27) – Whether a district court can enter a criminal forfeiture order when the time limit specified in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure has already passed. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:00 am
Viso then filed a lawsuit for breach of contract, bad faith, and intentional infliction of emotional distress in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 7:55 am
Uniformity on the issue does not exist. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Ashcroft v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Ashcroft v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm
That does not matter now, however. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm
The trial court ruled for ASEA, holding that the First Amendment “does not require the State to alter the union dues deduction practices in place prior to” the attorney general opinion. [read post]