Search for: "DOES I-X" Results 1581 - 1600 of 7,395
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2008, 12:38 pm
". . . .Judge Bybee: "Mr X, I think you have done a good job of defending a difficult case. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 9:49 am by Eugene Volokh
I thought I'd pass along portions of the friend-of-the-court brief that three other law professors and I (four of the very few academics who have written on the law of pseudonymous litigation) put together in support of a certiorari petition in Doe v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:38 pm by Rumpole
We saw the following on the FACDL Listserv: I just had the displeasure of arguing what appears to be Judge X's first Makemson hearing in which I was seeking to recover more than the $2,000 cap for a felony appeal. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 11:47 am
The mere fact that X exists to a degree now doesn't mean that expanding X categorically isn't a change in a plan. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 6:14 am by Nora Ellingsen
” While there were a few employees who told me that they had heard of someone in X unit or on Y squad who supported the firing, no one I spoke with had met these unicorns directly. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am by Eugene Volokh
I thought I'd pass along amicus brief that I submitted earlier this month in Doe v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 3:02 am by Bettina Clefsen
Even the customer who does not order directly would not put down the name “MO” for ordering, but rather the model number. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 3:36 pm
  I am often asked, "What is the biggest area of liability facing California employers? [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 6:31 am
The article does not specify which law might bar her claim, and unfortunately, as a South Florida medical malpractice lawyer myself, I know there are several laws that may stand in her way. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 1:41 pm
  There are tons of cases in which I think the correct legal result is X even though my ideological desire is Y. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 11:36 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  The future does not look good.Most importantly, readers will notice that today's headline does not indicate that this column is confined to a discussion of my new home state. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 7:26 am by Adam Thierer
The fact that x and y happened at more or less the same time does not in itself mean that x must have caused y, or indeed vice-versa. [read post]