Search for: "Does 1-88" Results 1581 - 1600 of 2,128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2011, 8:33 am by Howard Knopf
Institutions who resist providing information should be reminded of the Board’s powers pursuant to subsection 66.7(1) of the Copyright Act.Q. 10/10, 49/50, 88/89, 103/104: the questions as reformulated shall be answered. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:46 am by Paul F. Prestia
Even it is does not, such a Petition may be granted simply because of the importance of the questions raised to all concerned. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:55 am by Bill Raftery
As of today, the status of the 47 breaks down as follows: 38 died due to adjournment or had been rejected by their respective legislatures. 1 was signed into law (Arizona’s HB 2064 on April 12). 8 remain at least theoretically active: 4 in Alabama; 3 in Iowa; 1 in North Carolina. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
A 69(1) relates to the extent of protection conferred by a European patent of patent application. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., 06 CV 260, Trial Tr. (5/23/11), at 387-88 (E.D.N.Y.). [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:02 pm by Tomassi Law Associates
Tomassi Law Associates, LLC www.attorney-ri.com 1-888-RI-LAWLINE Posted at 01:00 PM ET, 05/16/2011 In St. [read post]
31 May 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It pointed out that as the patent lapsed several years ago, in accordance with R 84(1) and in line with decisions such as T 329/88, T 749/01 and T 1128/07, the present appeal proceedings should be terminated.According to the patent proprietor, R 84(1) did not make any distinction between oppositions filed before or after expiry of the patent. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:00 am by Bill Raftery
HB 2174 was introduced May 11 and sped quickly through the House which approved it on May 13 on an 88-3 vote. [read post]
19 May 2011, 7:15 am by Tim Baran
 This conversation does not add to that debate. [read post]
14 May 2011, 3:20 pm by Colin Miller
Mitesh’s departure does not trigger the end of the discrimination, at least on this record. [read post]
14 May 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
The scope of the term “comprising substantially” is therefore interpreted as being identical to that of “consisting essentially of” (see T 472/88 [3]). [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:07 pm by Bexis
., 636 F.3d 88 (4th Cir. 2011), is an example. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:31 am by GuestPost
 Moreover, in sections 6(5), 59 (1) and 60 (1) of the IRP Bill 2010 provided for the summary deportation of “foreign nationals”, which could result in the removal of an asylum seeker whose protection claims had failed, potentially resulting in their being refouled. [read post]