Search for: "Does 1-96"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 2,165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
Claim 22 referred to method claims 1 to 19 in a “short format” which was regarded to be clear in the decision T 410/96 of the boards of appeal. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:17 am
As discussed in a prior post (here), the U.K Bribery Act of 2010 is now set to take effect on July 1, 2011. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
Article 4(1) states generally that extradition shall not be granted for an offense of a political character. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:26 pm
Several points of utter miscellany about the opinion. 1. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:17 am
Banker, July 10, 2007, at 1). [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
Marzzarella, 614 F.3d 85, 96–98 (3d [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
Article 11(5) provides explicitly that discharge from custody pursuant to Article 11(4) does not preclude subsequent re-arrest and extradition of that person upon later delivery of the extradition request and supporting documents. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:38 am
Banker, July 10, 2007, at 1). [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
In each of the auxiliary requests 8 to 15, claim 11 was deleted.Before the oral proceedings (OPs), the patent proprietor withdrew its main request and auxiliary requests 1 to 7. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
As to an offense against a law relating to taxation, customs duties, exchange control, or other revenue matters, Article 2(6) provides that extradition may not be refused because the law of the Requested State does not impose the same kind of tax or duty or does not have the same kind of regulation as the law of the Requesting State. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:50 am
., 96 N.J. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
This means that the exact logic applied by the Board to the case above would not operate because R 137 as applicable today does not refer to a first communication any more.Does this mean that the situation is completely different today? [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:33 am
That being said, parties are reminded that the Board does not need all existing relevant information to set fair tariffs. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:46 pm
Dunnigan, 507 U.S. 87, 96 (1993) (“[A] defendant’s right to testify does not include a right to commit perjury. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
Article 4(1) states generally that extradition shall not be granted if the offense for which extradition is requested is a political offense. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
Article 5 bars extradition when the person sought has been convicted or acquitted in the Requested State for the same offense, but does [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:05 am
See SSR 96-2p at 114. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
Article 5 Prior Prosecution 1. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The Treaty does not require implementing legislation. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
Article 3(1) states generally that extradition shall not be granted for political offenses. [read post]
