Search for: "F & M LLC" Results 1581 - 1600 of 1,627
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2019, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
(f) Nursing corporation. (1) Licensed physicians and surgeons. (2) Licensed doctors of podiatric medicine. (3) Licensed psychologists. (4) Licensed optometrists. (5) Licensed marriage and family therapists. (6) Licensed clinical social workers. (7) Licensed physician assistants. (8) Licensed chiropractors. (9) Licensed acupuncturists. (10) Naturopathic doctors. (11) Licensed professional clinical counselors. (12) Licensed midwives. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
” Recall that in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 3:06 am
It's great reading, but I'm guessing Walter Olson will never get to sit on a tort jury. 5. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 1:44 pm
" Around that same time, after Gradient released another report questioning board members' independence, Byrne wrote to Vickrey: "Donn, you make a living toadying to bully hedge funds ... you deserve to be whipped, f--d, and driven from the land. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 11:51 am by admin
Back in March 2015, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) issued its working group’s monograph on glyphosate weed killer. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
In many jurisdictions, corporate officials sued for their actions undertaken in their corporate capacity may be able to defend themselves in reliance on the “business judgment rule. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
., LLC, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 189200, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 1:14 am by Florian Mueller
That's why Epic contented itself with just focusing on the legal question of whether there can be a market for something that isn't sold separately (by the way, the DOJ supports Epic not only but also on that one, and I'm still puzzled by Apple's explicit admission that iOS competes with Android). [read post]
4 May 2015, 4:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The law itself didn’t define “signage” or “advertising,” and applied to any non-exempt “[m]anufacturer” who produces, sells, distributes, or licenses GE products that are sold in or into Vermont, with no requirement that the signage and advertising occur in Vermont. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
Gibb, Attorney for Appellee JUDGE KATE APPLEBY authored this Opinion, in which JUDGES JILL M. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
Starting in 2002 and continuing for about a decade, 1-800 Contacts systematically locked up many of its online contact lenses retail competitors into settlement agreements that prohibited the parties from bidding on each other’s trademarks at the search engines. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am by Eric Goldman
On Monday, a unanimous three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit issued an important Internet free speech opinion, NetChoice v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am by Editors
Time to check your crystal ball to see what it portends for the legal industry in 2015 – or you can just head over to the Business of Law Blog to see what others think. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Ranbaxy and AstraZeneca reach agreement in Esomeprazole patent litigation: (SmartBrief), (IPBiz), (Spicy IP), (Profitability through Simplicity), (IP Law360), (Philip Brooks), (GenericsWeb), Cadbury loses Australian battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law… [read post]