Search for: "GORDON v GORDON"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 2,592
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2013, 7:21 am
Rather, the existence and extent of a plaintiff’s injuries is to be determined on the basis of the evidentiary record at trial: see Gordon v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 1:03 am
Murphy Oil USA and Connecticut v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 2:00 am
In the case of Brighter v. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 10:00 am
For example, in Pharmerica, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 8:20 am
Dirks v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:23 am
Gordon v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 4:37 am
Gordon, 2004 UT 2, 84 P.3d 1167. . . . [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 3:01 pm
Apple v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:37 pm
Gordon, 39 S.W.3d 604, 606 (Tex. 2001). [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 12:42 am
In a Supreme Court of B.C. ruling released this weekend, British Columbia Nurses’ Union v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 12:37 am
In case C-21/18, Textilis Ltd and Ozgur Keskin v Svenskt Tenn Aktiebolag, decided on March 14, 2019, the CJEU was asked whether the wording “other characteristics” of the new Article 7(1)(e)(iii) Regulation 2015/2424 may or may not be applied retroactively. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 12:04 pm
Key Issue Addressed: The court, in Zayo Group, LLC v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 7:13 am
Lasse Søndergaard Christensen and Kathrine Spinner MadsenIn a recent decision from 1 October 2018 (B-2740-17) the Danish Eastern High Court affirmed a decision of the Danish Commercial Court from December 2017 (V-8-17) in which the court had ruled that a café in Copenhagen had infringed the trademark rights and copyrights to the character Obelix which rightfully belongs to Les Editions Albert René S.A.R.L (Albert René). [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 2:14 am
Sara Parrello and Fabio AngeliniIn law, perhaps one of the most famous aphorisms is “I know it when I see it”, which Justice Potter Stewart used to describe his threshold test for obscenity (in Jacobellis v. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 5:01 am
In the recent decision of In re: GR Burgr, LLC; GR US Licensing, LP v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:35 am
Julius Stobbs and Katherine ThompsonIn a recent decision (Cartier International AGand others (Respondents) v British Telecommunications Plc and another(Appellants) [2018] UKSC 28), the UK Supreme Court has ruled that brand owners must pay Internet Service Providers’ (ISPs) costs for implementing website blocking injunctions. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 9:35 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:08 pm
Gordon, 895 F.2d at 932, 938 (4th Cir. 1990). [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 6:20 pm
Stroup v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Gordon, 39 Va. [read post]
