Search for: "He v. Holder" Results 1581 - 1600 of 5,732
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2024, 3:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
The court held that the conviction was consistent with the First Amendment, as applied in Holder v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:15 am by David Hemming (Bristows)
Continuing, he also noted that in Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) [2018] UKSC 56, the Supreme Court “upheld the distinction drawn between amendments to delete claims that have been held to be invalid and amendments designed to make good a claim not thus far advanced in the amended form”, in other words confirming that what the Court of Appeal had said in IPCom and Nikken was correct. [read post]
4 May 2007, 8:16 am
This was the issue before the Third Department yesterday in People v Cabrera, 2007 NY Slip Op 03798. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:00 am by Race to the Bottom
Additionally, River North Equity was primarily engaged in the business of seeking out and purchasing penny stocks from holders of convertible debt instruments and selling those shares. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 2:09 am by gmlevine
Of course, in order to maintain a proceeding the complainant must be a trademark holder. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:35 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The style of the case is "Cypress Texas Lloyds Property and Casualty Insurance Co. v. [read post]