Search for: "Human v. State" Results 1581 - 1600 of 19,091
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2020, 2:24 pm by Unknown
Bureau of Indian Affairs (Freedom of Information Act)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlLavallie v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 7 March 2012, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the Article 10 case of Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 3:29 pm by Lyle Denniston
Coakley) and the extent of state power to regulate abortion by uses of drugs rather than surgery (Cline v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Armellini v Austria (Judgment of 16 April 2015) the First Section of the Court of Human Rights dismissed an Article 10 complaint by applicants who had been found guilty of defaming professional footballers by accusing them of taking bribes. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 7:37 am
The provisional result is an instrument with the ambition to provide remedies to all violations of human rights committed by transnational but also by domestic enterprises, by the State, and by non-State actors throughout a supply chain. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am by Emma Cross, Olswang LLP
If the courts of England and Wales entertained challenges to the compatibility of Island legislation with the ECHR rights, this would clearly subvert the scheme of the Island’s own human rights legislation, The Human Rights (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law 2000. [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm by INFORRM
The Upper Tribunal has handed down judgment in the case of Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am by Larry Catá Backer
S. ____ (2013) and the ways in which, for me, sheds light on a reality of the structure of international human rights and business that may be belied by the torrent of lofty language churning out of elite state and non-state actors. [read post]
A consequential claim for damages in common law and for breach of Article 5(2) of the European Court of Human Rights was also dismissed. [read post]