Search for: "ILLINOIS v. WASHINGTON"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 1,748
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2009, 7:26 pm
Congratulations to NSSTA for an outstanding 2009 annual meeting in Washington, D.C. [read post]
5 May 2009, 10:31 am
The five states are Illinois, Nebraska, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Washington. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
District Court in Washington. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Here is why (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Innovative methods for corporate legal managers to reduce IP counsel costs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) The malign and the benign of the transfer of know-how (IP finance) How to avoid potential conflict when inventors want their innovations back (Technology Transfer Tactics) 50% of venture capital investment is lost: How your clients can improve these odds by using the right patent analytics (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) New website, Intellogist, compares patent search… [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:38 pm
Illinois — as well as its own Circuit precedent reaching the same conclusion — Bach v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
There's no medical monitoring precedent either way in Idaho either.IllinoisCourts in Illinois are all over the lot, and the state's supreme court ha [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
In any event, such language would be inspired by such cases as Illinois v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:39 pm
He successfully argued Spinelli v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:39 pm
He successfully argued Spinelli v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:47 am
Several other states have much more limited statutory provisions which address, among other things, no-hire covenants (Missouri), non-disclosure agreements (Washington), and profession-specific non-competes (Delaware, Illinois, New York, Massachusetts, and others).Legislation in this area is increasing, particularly as the economy flattens and employees conduct business across state lines. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 6:21 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia ruled in favor of the plaintiffs (Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
In December 2008, after the Securities and Exchange Commission (”SEC”) concurred in the exclusion of shareholder proposals seeking greater disclosure of risks related to mortgage investments at Washington Mutual, a coalition of over 60 investors called on then President-Elect Obama to limit the ability of companies to exclude shareholder proposals related to corporate risk evaluation.[10] The corporate governance challenges for the companies being targeted by these… [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
LLC v W. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:57 pm
But there was another venue order issued that day in the proceeding known as Gellman v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 1:02 am
The firm is also relocating Washington, D.C. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 6:02 am
All of our previous shows qualify in New York, California, Texas, Illinois, and Washington, and we plan to add more states later this year. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Lederle Laboratories, 732 P.2d 297, 306-07 (Idaho 1987).Illinois: Martin v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 8:19 pm
In December 1996, the Seventh Circuit, in Illinois High School Ass’n v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 9:49 am
Heller, in which the Court ruled that Washington, D.C. [read post]
