Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 1581 - 1600
of 18,396
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2011, 5:54 pm
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 6:25 am
We’re joined by two members of the firm’s Supreme Court and appellate practice — Pratik Shah, a former assistant to the solicitor general, and Martine Cicconi, who worked in the White House Counsel’s office and clerked for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 8:46 am
The day’s sole argument turned out to be Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 8:09 am
Today the Supreme Court issued its first opinion for the October 2022 term, a short unanimous opinion by Justice Amy Coney Barrett in Arellano v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 12:53 pm
In Hubbert v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:41 pm
I agree with Justice Kriegler that Jomo Zambia is guilty of pandering. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 1:05 pm
That's a pretty positive endorsement of Justice Baker. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
This was a two-justice concurrence. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:01 am
” Sessions was referring to 2015’s Johnson v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:05 pm
", I think we know what you're saying. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 3:14 pm
Maybe you're just yapping. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
You’re tripping, bro. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 5:20 pm
So unless you're willing to do that (which Justice Snauffer doesn't do), you've got to give a better answer, in my view. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:11 pm
The Farm Futures blog writes about the Sackett v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:10 pm
This means making sure those conservative Democrats running for re-election in red states understand that they will need the support of their base, and particularly Democratic women who support Roe v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 7:16 pm
Supreme Court held oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
MAJORITY OPINION JOHN DONOVAN, Justice. [read post]
17 May 2017, 1:01 am
When the case first came before the Court, three justices (all southerners), including Chief Justice Fred Vinson, believed that the old “separate but equal” doctrine enunciated in Plessy v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 6:45 am
Justice Kavanaugh, perhaps remembering his role in Bush v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 11:42 am
(Some justices would make it a constitutional rule, some differ on the particular remedy, etc.)(2) When the government promises something in a verbal plea agreement, but then allegedly breaks that promise -- and admits as much -- you're not bound to your part of the deal (e.g., your guilty plea), even if you said at the rote plea hearing (i.e., when you pled guilty) that there was no such promise. [read post]
