Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3" Results 1581 - 1600 of 7,889
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2008, 4:58 pm
They are: 1) Hart's rule of recognition is under- and over-inclusive; 2) Hart cannot explain how social practices are capable of generating rules that confer powers and impose duties and hence cannot account for the normativity of law; 3) Hart cannot explain how disagreements about the criteria of legal validity that occur within actual legal systems, such as in American law, are possible. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:58 am by Benton
Users can (1) input their health symptoms or (2) let sickweather’s algorithm crawl their Facebook and Twitter feeds for reports of illiness. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Judicial biographies took off in American legal thought in the 1960s.[2] With a recent resurgence in this work [3], new interests have now been piqued. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:03 am
The Director observed that a provision of the Rules may be waived when (1) an extraordinary situation exists, (2) justice requires, and (3) no other party is injured. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
"The Board parsed this evidence carefully, and the its finding was supported by substantial evidence.Weighing of the Factors: The Board found that du Pont factors 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8 weighed in favor of a finding of likelihood of confusion. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 2:33 am
This was not a motion or compel that would be subject to the requirements of Trademark Rule 2.120(f)(1).Text Copyright John L. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 12:16 am
It seems money has the same effect on the religious right as it does for the rest of us. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Sex offense recidivism rates Approximately 1-2% of adult males will eventually be convicted of a sexual assault, but this does not mean that they are all equally likely to repeat their crimes (Hanson & Bussiere, 1998; Hanson & Morton-Bourgon, 2005). [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 10:32 am by John J. Malm
Second, a dog will be deemed dangerous if: (1) the dog, (2) without justification, (3) bites a person, and (4) does not cause a serious physical injury. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 10:32 am by John J. Malm
Second, a dog will be deemed dangerous if: (1) the dog, (2) without justification, (3) bites a person, and (4) does not cause a serious physical injury. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:51 am by Jim Sedor
While the romance does not violate any rules, it has raised concerns among some good government groups. [read post]