Search for: "King v. State" Results 1581 - 1600 of 6,214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2016, 7:12 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 10:47 pm by Josh Blackman
See, e.g., Brown & Williamson, (drug agency regulating tobacco); King v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:09 am
City of New York Subscription Required KINGS COUNTYCriminal Practice Severance Not Required for Antagonistic Defenses; Prosecutors Granted Motion for Joinder People v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 4:18 pm
Yesterday, I posted an AP report by Deborah Hastings on political response to Kennedy v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 6:51 pm by Stephen Bilkis
On 21 May 2004, defendant entered state prison for violating probation. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 6:33 pm
Concisely stated, it is the contract, and not the will, which is irrevocable (see, 38 NY Jur 2d, Decedents' Estates, § 324; see also, Glass v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 5:14 am by Susan Brenner
The officers checked with local police to see if any warrants were outstanding for Larkin, and found one; State Troopers Coyle and Rodriguez went to King’s home to execute the warrant. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:47 am by David Kopel
Oklahoma City University’s Michael O’Shea explains  the history and multiple meanings of United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 1:29 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Court Explains Sentence Imposed After Guilty Plea On Indictment Charging Illegal Re-Entry United States v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:25 am
When the Kings County Supreme Court denied the landlord's dismissal request, he appealed to the Appellate Division, Second Department. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 8:32 am by James Romoser
Pharmaceutical Care Management Association (involving states’ efforts to regulate the private intermediaries between insurance companies and pharmacies) and Tanzin v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 7:50 am
 In Quality King Distributors, Inc. v L'anza Research Int'l, Inc., the Supreme Court held in 1998 that §602(a)(1), which refers to §106(3)'s exclusive distribution right, incorporates the "first sale" doctrine limitation. [read post]