Search for: "Law v. Phillips" Results 1581 - 1600 of 2,758
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2010, 2:32 pm
” [29] In essence, not only represented traditional committees would be subject to the disclosure rules, but also ad hoc committees. [30] V. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 12:29 am
The Word on Employment Law with John Phillips provides some additional thoughts maternity and layoffs. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:05 am by New Books Script
Toronto, Ont. : Continuing Professional Development, Law Society of Upper Canada, 2012 1 v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 9:21 am
See Phillips, 415 F.3d at 1323; Liebel-Flarsheim Co. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:45 pm
A Bronx Probate Lawyer that a Summary judgment may be granted only when it is clear that no triable issue of fact exists (Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986];Phillips v Joseph Kantor & Co., 31 NY2d 307, 311 [1972]). [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am by Adam Wagner
They stem from the long-established principle of United Kingdom public law that statutory powers must be used for the purpose for which they were conferred and not for some other purpose: Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1968] AC 997. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 6:30 pm
Plaintiffs, Lorillard Tobacco Company, Phillip Morris USA Inc., and R.J. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:49 am by Giles Peaker
The consultation requirement applies to a “set of works” (Phillips v Francis (2014) EWCA Civ 1395), and if a contractor engaged to carry out a set of works is unable to complete it there is no requirement for a fresh consultation about the same set of works, even if the price is going to go up (as it normally will if the original contractor gave the cheapest quote), and even if  the tenant’s contribution i [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
At The Washington Times, Alex Swoyer reports that Seila Law v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“In its February 16, 2017 order, the motion court correctly dismissed the first cause of action in the original verified complaint to the extent that it alleged a violation of Judiciary Law § 487, because plaintiff failed to plead the essential elements of a cause of action under the statute, i.e., intentional deceit and damages proximately caused by the deceit (see Judiciary Law § 487; Doscher v Mannatt, Phelps &… [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
Today’s live blog team comprises Lucy Hayes (Olswang), Anna Phillips (Nabarro), James Gliddon (CMS), Tom Sandeman (Nabarro), Emma Boffey (CMS) and Iona Millership (Olswang). 16.00 The Lord Advocate has now concluded his submissions for today. [read post]