Search for: "MATTER OF K A B" Results 1581 - 1600 of 2,720
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2013, 11:27 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
However, ERISA section 4(b)(4) may exempt from ERISA coverage “plans maintained outside the United States primarily for the benefit of persons substantially all of whom are nonresident aliens. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
”, the appellant’s objection as regards the subject-matter of claim 13 could be relevant under the requirements of A 100(b). [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm by Wells Bennett
AE 008: Defense Motion to Dismiss For Defective Referral (witness testimony) b. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am by Stephen Page
Under subsection (2), in addition, the issuing authority must consider the following: (a) any family law orders in force in relation to the defendant, or any pending applications for family law orders in relation to the defendant, of which the issuing authority has been informed; (b) the accommodation needs of the protected person; (c) the defendant's criminal record as defined in the Criminal Records (Spent Convictions) Act ; (d) the defendant's previous conduct whether in relation to the… [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
” In the [opponents’] view, claim 11 stated in essence that the point in time of adding the protease did not matter, and the combination of only two out of three possible points in time of adding the protease with the features of claim 1 represented a selection which was not derivable from the application as filed and which resulted in the addition of technical information. [11] In point 1.2.1 of its decision, the OD stated that “The presence of an alleged technical effect… [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 1:35 pm by Roshonda Scipio
., Tanya KaterÃ-.KG574 .H45 2013 Law SchoolsBest practices for building a high-tech law school : the process of designing educational spaces / April Mara Barton.Barton, April MaraChicago, IL : ABA, Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar, c2012.KF5702.S3 B37 2012 Legal HistoryThe founders and finance : how Hamilton, Gallatin, and other immigrants forged a new economy / Thomas K. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:18 am by Kevin Goldberg
 This was smack in the wheelhouse of Kevin Goldberg, a/k/a the Swami, who has long specialized in matters affecting access to information and the rights of the media. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:51 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Amid this uncertainty, however,  shifting rules are making matters worse for many employers while sequester cutbacks are reducing the tax credits that many small employers are counting on to help pay for health care coverage. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In substance, D2 discloses the examples A, B and C. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The method as claimed was regarded as a mix of technical features (step A) and non-technical features relying on the performance of mental activities based on the application of mathematical methods (steps B to E), the latter features being argued by the patentee to be core features of the invention. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
R.A.P. 1925(b)) is violated by the losing side’s “preserv[ation of] every unfavorable ruling and contested issue. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 11:56 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Tiger Asia Management, LLC, Tiger Asia Partners, LLC, Sung Kook (a/k/a Bill) Hwang, and Raymond Y.H. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Therefore the wording “connected only to” does not introduce subject-matter that extend beyond the content of the application as originally filed. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In the nearly complete opening stage shown in figures 11 and 12 the heel 10 is extracted from the element/frame 7 with the main portion of the strip 4, obviously together with the main portion of the inner thermoplastic strip attached to it. [1.2.5] Accordingly, D1 discloses in its embodiment shown in figures 8 to 12 (using the terminology of claim 1 of the patent in suit) a sealed package (packaging container 2 and opening arrangement 1) for pourable food products, having at least one removable… [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Specifically, under the PCT this is a formal deficiency under Article 14(1)(a)(v) in combination with Rule 11.13(a), which can be remedied upon invitation under Article 14(1)(b). [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:32 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Therefore, the Act applied, and the arbitrator had jurisdiction to review the matters raised in the applicant’s request for review. [read post]