Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 42,191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2016, 11:36 am
On the other hand, lawyers must recognize that the ethical rules are very much in play in the gathering and use of such evidence. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:24 pm
Plaintiff moved to remand to state court, arguing the removal notice was deficient as a matter of law for lack of any evidence supporting the figure. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 8:15 am
“Improperly moving furniture and entering the lounge without entitlement are two different matters. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 10:00 pm
McVerry ruled on the plaintiff’s motion in limine on miscellaneous matters by allowing the defendant to introduce Facebook posts into evidence that related to the plaintiff’s physical capabilities, but not those that related to his employability. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
The court found that evidence of direct corporate negligence was minimal, peripheral, and factually unrelated to the subject accident in this matter. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
“Ascertaining a person’s IQ is not a matter within the common knowledge of laypersons. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:57 am
A few interesting topics in this decision of the Board of Appeal, wherein an appeal was filed against the decision of the Examining Division to refuse the application.If there is a prior art document D2 that has the same purpose or objective as the claimed invention, is it then possible that another document D1 that has a different purpose is chosen as the closest prior art for assessing inventive step? [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:08 pm
Judge would not allow PX-337(B) in evidence, but ruled that the respondent could use it argumentatively in his summation. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 7:10 am
This limitation arose from the concern “testimony of the amount of an offer by one who did make it would offend the ‘[h]earsay’ rule, and the admission of the testimony by the offeror himself would lead to the investigation of collateral matters, and confuse the main issue. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 12:40 pm
O'Grady cited case law in ruling that prosecutors seeking to introduce aggravating factors can use crimes committed after the alleged crime that is the basis for the death penalty case. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 12:40 pm
O'Grady cited case law in ruling that prosecutors seeking to introduce aggravating factors can use crimes committed after the alleged crime that is the basis for the death penalty case. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:06 pm
Opinions differ widely on this matter today. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:47 am
" Thanks to Federal Evidence Review. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 9:03 am
., A-5207-09T1, November 17, 2011: Rule 4:49-2 provides that: a motion for . . . reconsideration . . . shall state with specificity the basis on which it is made, including a statement of the matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the court has overlooked or as to which it has erred. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 4:18 am
However, where there is demonstrated evidence of forum shopping, the court may decline to apply the "first-filed" rule. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 11:16 am
Former News of the World Editor Andy Coulson was today acquitted of perjury at the High Court of Justiciary in Edinburgh after the trial judge, Lord Burns, ruled that there was no case to answer. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 7:49 am
The benefits of rules are obvious. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 2:48 pm
A recent ruling handed down by an Albuquerque federal court reflects the difficulties inherent in winning post-trial motions for judgment as a matter of law or new trial. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 3:04 pm
They seek to balance important interests related to contract formation with the need to avoid bright-line rules, which remove the important function of judicial discretion.First, if the contract recites the consideration granted for the restrictive covenant, then it should control and the employer may not introduce evidence to contradict (or even supplement) its own agreement. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 10:47 am
But the court of appeals decided that Supreme Court and circuit precedent required “evidence of deception” to find actual misleadingness, even though none of those cases actually addressed whether survey evidence could be “evidence of [actual] deception. [read post]
