Search for: "MURPHY V US" Results 1581 - 1600 of 1,829
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2017, 12:31 pm by Jamie Baker
Beyer’s forthcoming article Estate Planning Ramifications of Obergefell v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:19 am by Dawn Mertineit and Katherine Perrelli
As an alternative, MUTSA allows for damages in the form of a “reasonable royalty” for the misappropriator’s unlawful use or disclosure of the trade secret, which is not explicitly identified as a measure of damages in the pre-MUTSA statute (although a handful of pre-MUTSA cases in Massachusetts have indicated a willingness to use the reasonable royalty damages framework). [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:00 am
(The case was entered into the court system under the name Van Valkerburg rather than Van Valkenburg or Quinn, so the briefs use Van Valkerburg.) [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
Thus where two or more factories independently pollute a stream, the plaintiff’s use of the water may be treated as divisible in terms of degree, and may be apportioned among the owners of the factories, on the basis of the respective quantities of pollution discharged into the stream. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:57 am by Rob Robinson
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:09 am by Robert Kossick
These FAQs can be used by importers to gain a better sense of how CBP is enforcing the UFLPA. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:24 am by Colin Murray
’ This interpretation was in turn rejected by the European Court of Human Rights in Gillan and Quinton v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Data Retention in the Aftermath of Digital Rights Ireland and Seitlinger, 24(4) Irish Criminal Law Journal 105, Maria Helen Murphy, National University of Ireland, Maynooth (NUI Maynooth) – Department of Law, SSRN. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:01 pm by Adam Feldman
To avoid confusion on the winning party in a case, I used the coding from the Supreme Court Database. [read post]