Search for: "Mark Wells "
Results 1581 - 1600
of 46,855
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2011, 3:21 am
" This differs from the examples cited by the Examining Attorney, in which the words are merely written in a different font.Overall, we find that the stylization and presentation of applicant’s mark falls more closely within the boundaries of the examples where the presentation of the marks was found to create a separate commercial impression.And so the Board affirmed the refusal to register on the mere descriptiveness ground, absnet a disclaimer; it gave Applicant… [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 3:43 am
Although there was no evidence of the extent of use of these marks, they are relevant to show that a particular term "has a normally understood and well-recognized descriptive or suggestive meaning, leading to the conclusion that that segment is relatively weak. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 3:58 am
" The USPTO, "on a record that may well have included more evidence than we have before us," found the design "not dictated by function alone. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:32 am
The Law now provides the possibility to a defendant to raise such counter - claims against national marks as well.9. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 11:09 am
Is the ultimate generic terma truly well-known mark? [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 1:26 am
It is arguable that, as there are plenty of other marks that use the same style of silhouette which have been registered, that the mark should be, potentially, registrable as well. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 3:27 am
Well, the word is that Mark Hurd had violated HP’s Standards of Business Conduct. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 3:45 am
" Applicant’s mark METAL HEADS is well-recognized unitary term with a very different meaning from the singular term METAL. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:34 am
The Court is well able to do its own research as needed, and filling this case's record with non-binding cases will simply clutter the file. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:50 pm
Marks of the news outlet NewsOK. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 3:34 am
Moreover, there was no evidence regarding the extent of use of the involved marks and thus no showing that there has been meaningful opportunity for confusion to have occurred.And so the Board affirmed the Section 2(d) refusal to register.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Well, would you have? [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 3:57 am
Based on one hundred years of use, impressive sales figures, and high brand recognition, the Board found the mark to be "very well-known and a commercially very strong mark and thus entitled to a broad scope of protection. [read post]
Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Are SUN SOUL ORCHESTRA and SOUL SUN Confusable for Musical Recordings?
28 May 2014, 4:24 am
Balancing the relevant duPont factors, the Board found confusion likely and it affirmed the Section 2(d) refusal.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog note: Well, do you agree with the Board? [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:59 am
This post was written by Mark S. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 5:44 am
This includes both identical trademark matches, as well as close variants. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 1:48 am
Some exciting news from Canada... well, if you are a trade mark geek enthusiast that is.The Canadian government recently introduced what appears to be a rather impressive change to the Canadian Trademarks Act (or should it still state "trade-mark"); see here for the underlying bill. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 1:29 am
Sweden) back in 1993, and• The fact that ABSOLUT is a well-known trade mark which enjoys has a world-wide reputation.Having heard both parties in full, the Register for Trade Marks upheld the opposition.Note: NJQ & Associates acted for the successful party in these proceedings. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 9:08 pm
Despite treaty provisions that say otherwise, U.S. courts generally do not recognize foreign trademark rights in the States — no matter how well-known those marks might be abroad. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:39 am
" However, none of the registrations referred to by Applicant were for the mark PHOTOGREFER.And so the Board affirmed the refusal.Read comments and post your comment hereTTABlog note: Well, would you have? [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 6:14 am
The questionnaire will gather the views of organisations on their general interest in the use of privacy seals, practical experiences they have with such schemes, and the potential commercial benefits, as well as any potential reservations they may have. [read post]
