Search for: "May v. Austin" Results 1581 - 1600 of 2,237
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2012, 7:59 am by Lyle Denniston
  Kagan was nominated to the Court in May 2010. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:50 am by Kali Borkoski
Myriad Genetics, a case involving whether human genes may be patented. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm by John Elwood
University of Texas at Austin, 11-345 (which asks whether the Equal Protection Clause permits UT Austin’s use of race in undergraduate admissions decisions) is still hangin’ around at the Court. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:07 am by New Books Script
JC 571 S74 2011 Special issue : human rights : new possibilities/new problems edited by Austin Sarat. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:14 am by Wessen Jazrawi
Conclusion This ruling may of course be appealed, and we continue to await the judgment of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in Austin, in which the Grand Chamber will consider whether two 2001 instances of kettling amounted to unlawful detention in breach of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 6:26 pm by Andrew Frisch
This approach is consistent with Eighth Circuit precedent in the context of class arbitrations, Dominium Austin Partners, L.L.C. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 11:00 am by Jack Martone
On January 11, the Court heard oral arguments in Roberts v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:00 am by Rob Robinson
bit.ly/wVssl2 (Jim Eidelman) Privilege Or Work Product Waivers - bit.ly/xENsqj (Federal Evidence Review) Resolution on 'Pippins' Discovery Nears, Though Debate Continues - bit.ly/zTrmUQ (Evan Koblentz) Review Website Ordered to Close after Defaming and Harassing Lawyers - bit.ly/tV21Ex (Pinsent Masons) Singapore eDiscovery Case Update: Surface Stone Pte Ltd v Tay Seng Leon and Another [2011] SGHC 223 - bit.ly/AcLYYc (Serena Lim) Social Media Gotchas in Court - bit.ly/AlNxmG (Eric… [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:34 am by Adam Wahlberg
Carter Phillips of Sidely Austin, last year's cover subject in Washington, DC Super Lawyers, appeared yesterday before the U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:01 pm by Barry Barnett
  HB 274 requires the Supreme Court in Austin to “create rules to provide for the dismissal” of baseless claims “on motion and without evidence. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That resentment has been encouraged by the Supreme Court’s decision in 2009, in the case of Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:50 am by Aaron Tang
Franita Tolson –   In NAMUDNO v. [read post]