Search for: "McDonald v. McDonald" Results 1581 - 1600 of 2,531
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
.** In McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, Ct. of Appeals, 92 N.Y.2d 326, the Court of Appeals ruled that in the absence of a Taylor Law contract providing otherwise, a municipality’s past practice does not demonstrate any right to compel the municipality to continue providing the same level of health benefits to its retirees as it has in the past.The decision is posted on the Internet… [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 7:27 am
The Proceedings In 2006 McDonald's International Property Co. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 7:44 pm
In the Supreme Court, hyper-technicalities are most frequently used to defeat the claims of deserving plaintiffs, as in the now-Congressionally-overruled Ledbetter case or even worse, in Bowles v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
So if you are teaching a constitutional law course and would like to include a 2 or 3 week unit on the Second Amendment, your students could buy chapter 9 (Heller and McDonald) plus chapter 11 (post–Heller cases in the lower courts). [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 6:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Additionally, to the extent that the breach of contract claim is alleged and based on the same factual assertions supporting the proposed legal malpractice claim, said cause of action must be dismissed as it is a duplicative claim and/or a claim guised as a breach of contract but is in fact alleging legal malpractice (see Courtney v McDonald, 176 AD3d 645 [1st Dept 2019]). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:01 am by Guest Blogger
Adam WinklerOne important question raised by McDonald v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:49 am by Lawrence Solum
The incorporation story features analysis of John Paul Stevens’ final passionate dissent after 35 years on the Court, which came in last Term’s blockbuster Second Amendment incorporation case, McDonald v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 3:53 pm by Mike
McDonald is a petition for habeas corpus on both grounds listed above. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:25 am by Tessa Shepperson
Previous Court of Appeal decisions (ie Fernandez v McDonald in 2003) have found that if the date on the notice is even one day wrong, the landlord will fail in his claim for possession. [read post]