Search for: "PARTY CITY HOLDINGS, INC." Results 1581 - 1600 of 2,327
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2019, 7:30 am by Will Baude
" Id. at 243; see also American Trucking Ass'ns, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia September 9, 2011 Liberty University, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 10:30 am by Sherin and Lodgen
Gormally, 440 Mass. 699, 701 (2004) (holding that statute applied to all claims affecting title or use and occupation of property). [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:22 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
This is true even where that individual joined in the false representations that induced the contract”]; McGarry v Miller, 158 AD2d 327 [1st Dept 1990] [“plaintiff may have a cause of action against Mutual Benefit for rescission” but “as M & M was not a party to the contract, no such cause of action may be alleged against it”]; and Alexander City Bank v Equit. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 10:30 am by Sherin and Lodgen
Gormally, 440 Mass. 699, 701 (2004) (holding that statute applied to all claims affecting title or use and occupation of property). [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 12:02 am
Safeguard, Inc., 817 N.E.2d 664, 667 (Ind.Ct.App.2004)Then we have DeMoss v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:20 pm
Albert Gore, Jr. in 2000 look like a city council election, and could even result in Alaska Gov. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 10:30 am by Sherin and Lodgen
Gormally, 440 Mass. 699, 701 (2004) (holding that statute applied to all claims affecting title or use and occupation of property). [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:25 pm
City of Seattle, 387 U.S. 541, 543 (1967) (“The businessman, like the occupant of a residence, has a constitutional right to go about his business free from unreasonable official entries upon his private commercial property. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm by Christopher Walker
United States Aid Funds, Inc., a case from the U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:14 pm
" U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, September 03, 2008 Villegas v Gilroy Garlic Festival, No. 05-15725 "In a civil rights action against the City of Gilroy and the Gilroy Garlic Festival Association, alleging First Amendment violations involving the festival's dress code, summary judgment to defendants and a holding of no state action or municipal liability are affirmed where: 1) the festival association is not a state actor; and 2) the City had no part in… [read post]
The parties debated the scope of the proposal for nearly seven years, resulting in Martha eventually agreed to reduce the scope of the project area from 64 acres to 32 acres, and to dedicate 71% of the parcel as public open space. [read post]