Search for: "PROPERTIES FOUR, INC. v. State" Results 1581 - 1600 of 1,989
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am by Kevin Kaufman
The absence of a de minimis threshold for business tangible property tax liability imposes substantial compliance costs on many businesses while yielding a negligible amount of additional revenue for local governments. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 11:44 am by Dennis Crouch
More specifically, we recognize the usefulness of examining intellectual property issues through the lenses of competition and consumer protection. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Contributor
 It is hoped that the new provincial government will address the issue of SLAPPs during its four year term. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
The parties are likewise duking it out about whether the underlying decision at issue in the four-time relist Trump v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:13 am
Supreme Court rulings, including this month's Quanta Computer Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
New South Wales District Court Judge Judith Gibson argues the case for reform in a paper she delivered on 29 November 2010 to the Intellectual Property, Media and Communications Law Roundtable held at UTS. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg, Patrick Gregory reports that “Missouri’s attorney general election Nov. 8 could determine whether a long-unscheduled religious freedom argument,” in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Goff, No. 05-5524 A sentence of four months imprisonment, three years of supervised release, and a fine, for possessing hundreds of electronic images of child pornography is vacated and remanded for resentencing where the district court's sentence was not reasonable in light of the circumstances of the case. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
LLC Law § 417 (a)(1); § 420; TIC Holdings LLC v HR Software Acquisitions Group Inc., 301 AD2d 414, 415 (1st Dep’t 2003). . . . [read post]
Jul. 3, 2009)(Johnson) (mandamus granted) (trial court judge ordered to state specific reason(s) for disregarding jury verdict and granting new trial; 'in the interest of justice' is no longer acceptable)This is also the case in the which the attorney for the wrongful-death plaintiffs filed a motion to recuse four of the nine justices for the empirically documented proclivity of the court to favor tort defendants. [read post]