Search for: "People v Catchings" Results 1581 - 1600 of 1,855
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
As she puts it in her bio, "I care very much about information technology and how it affects people's lives, but I'm concerned that legal policies and precedents are being very foolishly decided that are ultimately detrimental to society. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
As she puts it in her bio, "I care very much about information technology and how it affects people's lives, but I'm concerned that legal policies and precedents are being very foolishly decided that are ultimately detrimental to society. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 2:41 am by SHG
Why, if the Supremes were going to issue a one sentence per curiam opinion in Briscoe v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:00 am by Kevin Russell
Does the Court's decision in Parents Involved v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 9:50 am by michael a. livingston
That a then Yale professor and later Federal judge (Ralph Winter) was the brains behind the original challenge to campaign finance laws, in Buckley v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 3:46 am by SHG
Granted, after the catch-22 decision in Ricci v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 10:00 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
A recent poll in the UK shows that following Switzerland’s minaret ban people in that country would be open to a similar minaret ban as well. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 3:54 am
At the end of his decision, Judge Carney recalled a passage from Berger v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 12:00 pm
It was a ridiculous position, but they seemed to believe that if they waited outside her house long enough with a video camera, they would catch her doing back flips in her front yard. [read post]