Search for: "People v J." Results 1581 - 1600 of 7,242
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2023, 2:15 am by Matrix Law
Jones appealed the order of Burton J to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:36 am
Never too late 16  [week ending Sunday 19 October] -- The Court of Appeal for England and Wales in Nampak Plastics Europe Ltd v Alpla UK Ltd | Former Eagle member claims infringement of his name in the US | The Court of Appeal for England and Wales in Specsavers v Asda | A change in format for the European Patent Attorney exam | Reflections over IP5 patent filing figures |  ‘Common Sense For Copyright’… [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:46 am
Matthias Zigann (presiding judge of the Munich Regional Court), and also some emailed observations from Birss J (who was unable to attend).Arnold J noted that the literature is conclusive that experts are no better than lay people at avoiding hindsight bias, and that telling someone to avoid hindsight does not work. [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:19 am by Guest Blogger
 He can be reached at j-mcginnis@law.northwestern.edu. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Clark, 2022 SKCA 36; 2022 SCC 49 (40090) Karakatsanis J.: “We agree with Justice Leurer, in dissent, that a specific Hibbert type instruction (R. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
(Massachusetts) ("A railroad…has the primary purpose of transporting goods and people. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:46 am by Ray Dowd
Kingdom of Spain CaseCopyright Litigation Handbook (West 4th Ed. 2009) by Raymond J. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:10 pm
If a Court finds that 2 or more people are responsible for a motor vehicle collision in British Columbia the Court must ‘apportion’ liability as between them. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 3:36 pm
 The number of relevant skilled people attending such presentations at a conference may be relevant in assessing whether information conveyed in that session is CGK. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:43 am by Isabel McArdle
As we have reported, in May 2011 the Supreme Court ruled in R (on the application of GC) (FC) (Appellants) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Respondent). [read post]