Search for: "People v Levels (Robert)" Results 1581 - 1600 of 1,684
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
People v Castellano, 41 AD3d 184, 185; People v Carter, 40 AD3d 1310, 1312). [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 9:20 pm
Worse, judges should not permit unscientific and self-serving trial-level testimony of cops to create such a notion. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Historical perspective on consumer acceptance of food irradiation Prior to FDA’s new rule for fresh iceberg lettuce and spinach, food irradiation at similar medium-level doses was approved in the US for numerous applications including control of foodborne pathogens in other fresh and processed foods. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
According to Diogenes Laërtius, this was to convince the people of his time that he had been taken up by the gods on Olympus. * 272 BC: Pyrrhus of Epirus, the famous conquerer and source of the term pyrrhic victory, according to Plutarch died while fighting an urban battle in Argos on the back of an elephant when an old woman threw a roof tile at him, stunning him and allowing an Argive soldier to kill him. * 270 BC: Philitas of Cos, Greek intellectual, is said by… [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
(Green Patent Blog)   Global - Copyright Conference calls on WIPO to boost support for collective management of copyright and related rights (WIPO) Librarians take the copyright battleground in developing countries (Intellectual Property Watch) Creative Commons study on how people understand the term ‘noncommercial use’ (Creative Commons)   Africa Time to follow the example of Nashville? [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 12:37 am
The five judges are of course Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito and Kennedy. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 3:16 pm
Roberts v Mecosta General Hospital, 466 Mich 57 (2002), after remand 470 Mich 679 (2004) and Burton v Reed City Hospital Corp, 471 Mich 745 (2005) The Taylor Court denies court access to persons injured by medical negligence based on minor technicalities. 6. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 6:41 pm
  The Court, as indicated in the original Kennedy v. [read post]