Search for: "People v. Sample"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 1,949
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2010, 2:41 pm
On July 27th the USPTO set up more stringent rules for the issuance of BMPs in their Interim Guidance for Determining Subject Matter Eligibility for Process Claims in View of Bilski v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 7:39 am
The results are a less informed electorate and a judiciary increasingly out-of-touch with the people they serve. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 9:45 am
Hill and Cantrell v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 8:22 am
Test your own hearing, and compare the samples to the sample we took at the Gallery Place-Chinatown Metro stop. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 11:13 am
Despite this analysis, many universities and one aberrant California case (Williams v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 11:13 am
Despite this analysis, many universities and one aberrant California case (Williams v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:50 pm
Doe A. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:36 am
Fang G, Araujo V, Guerrant RL [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 9:53 pm
Mead PM, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, and Tauxe RV [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 4:03 am
DiCola: what happens when people innovate to avoid sample clearance issues? [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:47 am
Girl Talk’s music, 100 samples. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:45 am
Anything v. a Fortune 500 company = fair use less likely. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 5:11 pm
“ In Brown v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 12:54 pm
This necessarily results in some errors, because juries will differ, and my sense is that it's a one-way rachet: rarely will jurors erroneously say "this murder isn't especially bad" based on a sample size of one (if only given that most murders are indeed horrible), and there's a significantly higher risk that a jury may conclude that a particular murder is "especially" bad even if an observer who reviews the totality of murders would conclude… [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:19 pm
There seems to be no question that the "random sample" method of selection indeed produces a roughly random sample of representatives of houses of worship from the area sampled. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 5:28 pm
Here is the abstract: In McDonald v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 8:22 am
The case, known as Furman v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
In May, 2010, wedding food also hospitalized at least one hundred people in Northern India. [read post]
