Search for: "People v. Superior Court" Results 1581 - 1600 of 3,634
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2016, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Liu: Private ordering can mean different things to different people. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 1:04 pm by Jon Sands
This was largely because the California Supreme Court ordered a hearing on the petitioner's claim under People v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym of the Federal District Court for the District of Central California. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Colin Lachance
When you read R. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:46 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
         Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 6:05 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the appeals court vacated the award and ordered a new trial since the district court erroneously allowed former administrators to provide lay opinion testimony in which they “nakedly” speculated that the mayor considered race in his appointments (Village of Freeport v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:07 am by Bill Otis
 It's a somewhat long story, but Justice Scalia is there at the end.As some here know, I left the Department of Justice in early 2000 because of the Department's refusal to defend in the Supreme Court its victory in the Fourth Circuit in Dickerson v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 6:38 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The article has been cited numerous times by academic researchers and in an amicus brief filed with the Supreme Court in Friedrichs v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 11:41 am by Jeff Gittins
Last week, the Utah Court of Appeals issued a decision in the case of Utah Alunite Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 5:57 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice released a decision in R. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am by John Elwood
There are two types of people in D.C.: those who can’t handle a little bit of snow; and those who enjoy ridiculing them. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
In Markoulakis v SNC-Lavalin Inc., the Ontario Superior Court of Justice concluded after considering the Bardal factors that long-serving employee Eftihios (Ed) Markoulakis was entitled to 27 months of common law reasonable notice following his termination from a senior role at SNC-Lavalin. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 2:28 pm
Superior Court, 457 U.S. 596, 102 S.Ct. 2613, 73 L.Ed.2d 248 (1982). [read post]