Search for: "Peters v. Doe"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 3,581
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2017, 11:23 am
In a case of “idea theft,” film industry defendants who argued the right to free speech protected them against a claim of stealing a screenplay that was later made into “The Purge” films were recently slapped down by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (Jordan-Benel v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:16 am
From a panel decision Bennie v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 7:20 am
If that turns out to the case then Illumina Cambridge Limited v Latvia MGI Tech SIA and others is a substantial judgment to mark this departure. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Off-campus work (IRPR, s 186(v)). [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
Justice McEwan held in Vilardell v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:40 pm
Concepcion (2011) and American Express v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 8:58 am
However, G2/98 itself does not mention this. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
Corp. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 9:43 am
" The New York Court of Appeals held in 2007 in the case Dinallo v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 5:28 am
Peter Dinklage as Tyrion Lannister in a scene from Season 4 of “Game of Thrones. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 12:59 pm
" Speaking for the respondents, Peter K. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:30 am
[cross-posted and expanded with a P.S. from Cato at Liberty] Even by his standards, Paul Krugman uses remarkably ugly and truculent language in challenging the good faith of those who take a view opposed to his on the case of King v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
As illustrated most recently in the Access Copyright v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 1:54 am
You remember the Branch Consultants v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:38 am
On October 23, 2019, the Appellate Division in Jacob v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 8:51 pm
In Merrifield v. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 1:30 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 6:00 am
In Nijhawan v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 10:49 pm
See Card v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:49 am
Charles Terence Estates Ltd v Cornwall Council [2011] EWHC 2542 (QB) (subnom oh dear, oh dear)Forgive the length of this note, but this seems to be a significant case with potentially far-reaching ramifications. [read post]
