Search for: "Qui Tam" Results 1581 - 1600 of 4,759
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2008, 5:03 pm
Supreme Court on February 26, making it the sixth time a qui tam suit has gone before the high court. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 5:43 am by The Docket Navigator
Defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's qui tam false marking action for failing to plead with particularity was granted where plaintiff alleged the websites of defendant's affiliates claimed defendant's product was patented. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 9:36 am by Lindsey Williams
The qui tam provisions in the bill provide strong protections and financial rewards for reporting financial fraud. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:05 pm by mcarzima@imediainc.com
A qui tam complaint against Par Pharmaceuticals was unsealed yesterday in Chicago. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 8:27 am
Florida based, Acculab Laboratories has agreed to settle a qui tam suit alleging false claims and fraudulent billing to Medicare. [read post]
In a speech to the Federal Bar Association’s annual qui tam conference on Feb. 20, 2025, Michael Granston, Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Commercial Litigation Branch at the U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:51 am by Nolan and Auerbach
A whistleblower, who filed a qui tam complaint under the False Claims Act, first brought the case to government’s attention. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 11:28 am by fraudfighters
  The qui tam lawsuit was filed under the False Claims Act by a whistleblower who learned about the company’s fraudulent conduct. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 7:13 am by Ben Vernia
On February 25, the Department of Justice announced that a Williston, South Carolina-based ambulance company has settled claims originally brought under the False Claims Act by a qui tam relator, that the company billed the government for medically unnecessary ambulance transports. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 9:53 pm by Ben Vernia
On March 29, the Department of Justice announced that CDW-G, the government contracting arm of the information technology supplier, CDW, has agreed to pay over $5.66 million to settle claims originally brought by a qui tam relator. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 10:46 pm by eithurburn@getnicklaw.com
  The whistleblower filed a qui tam case in 2007 alleging that Verizon had impermissibly charged the federal government for surcharges which were already included in its telecommunications contract. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 3:34 am by Ben Vernia
On January 7, the Department of Justice announced that it had settled a qui tam whistleblower’s case against Ohio-based health care providers, for a combined $4.4 million. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 7:18 am by The Docket Navigator
Plaintiff's motion to amend his qui tam complaint for false marking to add a new defendant was denied as futile because two other relators had already settled their false marking claim against the proposed defendant. [read post]
7 May 2013, 1:06 am by Ben Vernia
On May 7, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform held a contentious hearing on allegations that DOJ Civil Rights Division Assistant Attorney General and Labor Secretary nominee Thomas Perez had brokered a “quid pro quo” under which the Civil Division would decline to intervene in two qui tam cases involving the city of St. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 12:01 am by Ben Vernia
On January 14, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the Middle District of Florida’s dismissal of a qui tam suit brought against Walt Disney World Co. and the Reedy Creek Improvement District. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 10:48 pm by Ben Vernia
On September 27, the Department of Justice announced that a doctor and his practice in Kentucky have settled allegations raised in a qui tam suit by a former employer. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:23 am by Ben Vernia
In an unpublished decision on February 2, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a New Jersey District Judge’s dismissal of a declined qui tam suit. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:52 am by The Docket Navigator
The court denied defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's qui tam false marking action and rejected defendant's argument that marking with the conditional phrase "[X products] are covered by one or more of the following U.S. patents: [#A, #B, #C, #D] and other patents pending," negated an inference of intent to deceive. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 8:54 am
Not a civil case, but Regenerations founder gets 10 years, owes Medicaid $3.3M treads on an issue interesting to me: whistleblower/.qui tam cases. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:30 am by Aurora Barnes
United States 16-1398 Issues: (1) Whether a qui tam realtor’s complaint under the False Claims Act satisfies Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) by alleging nothing more than the opportunity for fraud, as held by the U.S. [read post]