Search for: "SESSIONS v. STATE"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 6,572
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
Trying to nullify state capture. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
” A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 1 AC 68, Lord Bingham. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am
The first type—an assertion of presidential communications privilege—represents the core of executive privilege that was first recognized in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:25 am
A view from the Mary Quantexhibition at the V&AOn Monday evening, the Victoria & Albert Museum saw over two-thousand attendees pour through its marble and tiled halls for AIPPI's Cultural Evening. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:01 am
Bills that did not make the cut may resurface in January in the second part of the two-year session. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 4:12 pm
By 2013, the parties attended more than 35 bargaining sessions, but no collective bargaining agreement was reached. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
He appears to be conveying the importance of the view from the Inner House of the Court of Session. 1421: Aidan O’Neill QC says we are faced with a country that is afraid to know itself. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House of the Court of Session placed no reliance on the absence of a witness statement. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 12:37 pm
As an example, she referred to the English case of Marinos v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 10:07 am
Several criminal and related cases are on the docket.NY State Rifle & Pistol v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am
In England & Wales, Gina Millar (the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5) also raised proceedings, following the Queen’s signing of the Order in Council. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:00 am
NAACP and McAleenan v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:07 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:18 pm
United States.) [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 2:00 am
Cathleen Yonahara, Esq., Freeland Cooper & Foreman LLP will be presenting a session on the interaction between state and federal laws: On the Record: Inside Look at How the Latest California and Federal HR Laws, Court Rulings and Regulations Impact Recordkeeping and Workplace Policies. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 3:57 pm
Assembly Bill (AB) 5, authored by Assembly Member Lorena Gonzalez (D-San Diego), has been one of the most contentious measures of the 2019 legislative session. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 8:12 am
In Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 2:11 pm
” On the second point, the authorization for committee staff to question witnesses is an exercise of Rule XI, clause 2(j)(2)(C) of the House rules, which states that committees may so authorize staff. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 8:35 am
A recent case before the Human Rights Committee, Portillo Caceres v. [read post]
