Search for: "State v House" Results 1581 - 1600 of 28,759
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2021, 2:30 am by S S
Hot on the heels of the decision in R (Imam) v London Borough of Croydon (2021) EWHC 739 (Admin) (see our note here) comes this altogether more satisfying decision, Elkundi & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Birmingham City Council (2021) EWHC 1024 (Admin), on the nature and enforceability of the duty under s. 193(2) Housing Act 1996. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 5:29 am
The House of Lords gave judgment yesterday in this human rights judicial review about provisional listing under Part VII of the Care Standards Act 2000, which sets up a scheme for "listing" people thought unsuitable to work with children and vulnerable adults - and preventing those listed from working in a care position.Before I go on, I'd better declare an interest: back in 1999 and 2000 I was [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:00 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This decision is worth reading for civil rights lawyers also, since the principles are the same.The case is House v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:00 am
 The judiciary, right from the famous case of Virsa Singh v State of Punjab 1958 AIR 465 has relied literally on the medical reports to adjudicate the actus reus of the accused and this reliance has been time and again criticized. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 9:02 am
 The judiciary, right from the famous case of Virsa Singh v State of Punjab 1958 AIR 465 has relied literally on the medical reports to adjudicate the actus reus of the accused and this reliance has been time and again criticized. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:58 pm by Jack Goldsmith
 That said, it is also consistent with Daniel’s statement that other Departments outside of the Intelligence Community or DOD (such as the Commerce and State Departments) might sometimes have input in the store v. disclose decision. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 5:47 am by Giles Peaker
Macleod, R (on the application of) v The Governors of the Peabody Trust [2016] EWHC 737 (Admin) Ever since R (Weaver) v London and Quadrant Housing Trust [2010] 1 WLR 363 (our report) there has been an ongoing issue as to whether housing associations (or specific housing associations) were public bodies both for the purposes of the Human Rights Act and public law/judicial review. [read post]