Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 9,084
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2011, 2:26 pm
R (Baron, Peat & Othrs) v Hyndburn District Council, Administrative Court, Manchester District Registry, 14 April 2011 (Not on BAILII as yet)J has previously alluded to this case involving an application for permission for Judicial Review of a local authority decision to make a selective licensing designation. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:46 am
The First District Court of Appeals upheld the trial court’s ruling in a split decision. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm
” The Court’s test permits judicial scrutiny of only the former. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 11:44 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 5:04 pm
(Citing North Coast Rivers Alliance v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:20 am
Observing that the judicial privilege is not “a license for extra-judicial defamation,” a federal district court in Pennsylvania enjoined an employee from communicating with his former employer’s customers regarding its alleged “discriminatory and abusive practices” that were “illegal, immoral, or both. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 12:42 pm
The District Court then cited Martin v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 12:42 pm
The District Court then cited Martin v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 7:33 am
WHITING DOOR MANUFACTURING CORP. et al – United States District Court – Western District of Pennsylvania – February 14th, 2019) involves a personal-injury lawsuit arising from injuries that the plaintiff sustained while employed as a truck driver. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:01 pm
The complaint raised claims under the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution (made applicable to states and local governments by virtue of the Fourteenth Amendment) as well as under Colorado state law (the state constitution and a state statute). [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:00 am
Dover District Council v CPRE Kent, heard 16 Oct 2017. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 9:42 am
It is a 1972, Houston Court of Appeals [1st District] case styled, Latham v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 5:29 am
Governmental Immunity Arguments The district appealed, arguing first that it enjoyed immunity from condemnation suits as a subdivision of the state. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:47 pm
This is an important question because if there was no constitutional violation, there was no basis for any federal court intervention in the first place, and the Supreme Court was correct to curtail the district court's order. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:42 am
Obama (10-487) — raised an immediate question of whether the Court will take on any of several disputes over the judicial procedures being used in lower federal courts to implement the Justices’ 2008 decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
”Ibid.Soon after Amendment 2 was adopted, this litigation to declare its invalidity and enjoin its enforcement was commenced in the District Court for the City and County of Denver. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:17 am
Texas, United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:17 am
The district court denied the motion. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 9:43 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia and the D.C. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Oaktree appeals, contending that the district court erred in granting the motion to amend the complaint and that the district court's remand order is reviewable because the case was properly removed in the first instance. [read post]
