Search for: "State v. Frame" Results 1581 - 1600 of 6,711
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2015, 7:22 am
The So-Called 10% Rule2)    A Response Regarding the 10% Rule3)    Situating the Opposition--The Hypocrisy of Misrepresentative GovernmentOn 14th January this year, the Delhi High Court in the case of Imran Ali v Union of India delivered its judgment in the light of a PIL seeking the appointment of an LoP. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Second, the framers of the Civil Rights Act sought to enforce the “privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states” protected under Article IV and described in the antebellum case Corfield v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:38 am by Benjamin Goh
The UPC is a new patents court which came into force on 1 June 2023, made up of judges who are nationals of EU Member states that are participating in the UPC. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:05 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Supreme Court uses an inmate suicide case to remind us how hard it is to hold individual government defendants liable in constitutional cases whey they can assert qualified immunity, a legal doctrine that shields them from litigation when the state of the law is not clearly-established at the time of the violation.The case is Taylor v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
At the WLF Legal Pulse, Jeffri Kaminski looks at Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm by KC Johnson
To take one example: in a high-profile 2011 decision, Henry v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:04 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  Stated otherwise, under Pennsylvania law, a cause of action framed as a tort but reliant upon contractual obligations will be analyzed to determine whether the cause of action properly lies in tort or contract. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:48 am by Adam Baker
Turning to the second question Binnie J reviewed what was then the leading Canadian case on fundamental breach: Hunter Engineering Co. v Syncrude Canada Ltd. [1989] 1 SCR 426. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 2:37 pm by Ann-Therese Schmid
If rolling stock vehicle frames or car shells are components that are not produced in the United States, and if the average cost of the rolling stock vehicle is more than $300,000, the FAST Act permits the inclusion of the cost of steel or iron that is produced in the US and included in the frames or car shells in the calculation of domestic content in the rolling stock vehicle. [read post]