Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 8,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2019, 11:00 pm
Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 12:20 am
GuestKat Peter Ling reports on this interesting decision.Richard Vary provides a guest contribution, in which he looks into the recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, which overturned a decision issued in December 2017 by Judge Selna in the Central District of California, instead going to a jury trial.Trade MarksGuestKat Léon Dijkman looks at the recent Opinion of Advocate General Bobek in Primart… [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
Decisions this Week United KingdomGilham v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 1:03 pm
Thus, the famous case of Perry v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:34 am
See Holder v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 3:53 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 1:25 pm
Holder. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 12:33 pm
The latter is an issue that two automotive industry bodies have raised in a filing with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.For a list of previous posts on amicus curiae briefs in FTC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Floresand Shelby County v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 11:20 am
Bank v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
That is, if a suspect at any time prior to or during the questioning states that he wants to consult with an attorney, “the interrogation must cease until an attorney is present. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
JJS, Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 1:47 pm
The contract included a work-made-for-hire agreement and so the state is legally the author and copyright holder (if copyright persists). [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 7:09 am
No other cellular SEP holder comes to that negotiation making threats about cutting off its supply of products. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 4:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 8:55 am
"That quote is also interesting with a view to the recently-filed Intel and Apple v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 8:50 am
The FTC, too, notes that "[s]pecial deference is paid to a trial court's credibility findings," as the Ninth Circuit stated in Exxon Co. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 8:08 am
The Second Circuit held that the non-bank loan holder was not entitled to the preemptive protection of the National Bank Act, which allows nationally chartered banks to export the interest rates of their home state without being subject to the usury limits of any other state in which the bank makes loans. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 7:18 am
Shaw v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 9:12 pm
Since our client resided in Chicago, IL, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
