Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2018, 1:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
But the approach taken by the Court of Appeal in R v Wandsworth London Borough Council, Ex p O [2000] 1 WLR 2539 remained the law and had not been changed by the House of Lords in M v Slough. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
But the approach taken by the Court of Appeal in R v Wandsworth London Borough Council, Ex p O [2000] 1 WLR 2539 remained the law and had not been changed by the House of Lords in M v Slough. [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:50 pm
469, he referred to the decision of the House of Lords in Jones v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
The PCC has published Lord Hunt’s contribution here. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 3:35 am
Her predominant legal interest lies in the areas of state crime and international human rights. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
In R v Lord Chancellor Ex p Witham[1998] QB 575 he noted (at 581) that “in the unwritten legal order of the British state” it is “the common law [which] continues to accord a legislative supremacy to Parliament”. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:39 am
United States) and June 27, 2023 (Counterman v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am
Lord Justice Arnold gave observations on the EBA’s decision in G2/21. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:49 am
In giving the lead majority judgment Lord Sumption stated that the conditions for liability to the tax charge in ss 591C(4)-(6A) of the Act only make sense on the footing that the “cessation of the approval of the scheme” is the effective date of the withdrawal of the approval and not the date of the notice itself. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord… [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord… [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 5:52 am
The lord doesn't think he's a judge. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
On 4 October 2011 the Court of Justice duly delivered its ruling in Joined Cases C-403/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA v QC Leisure, David Richardson, AV Station plc, Malcolm Chamberlain, Michael Madden, SR Leisure Ltd, Philip George Charles Houghton and Derek Owen and C-429/08 Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (see IPKat post here), following which Mr Justice Kitchin -- having metaphorically vanished as Gandalf… [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 11:00 pm
The panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 1:04 am
(photo credit) In Regina v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 5:21 pm
v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 3:36 pm
I would not go so far as to say that all that the Secretary of State has to show is that his policy is not irrational, although Lord Neuberger in R (RJM) (see para 51 above) perhaps came quite close to that. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 1:00 am
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 31 Oct-1 Nov 2017. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 5:51 pm
This will be the first defamation case heard by the highest court since the decision of the House of Lords four years ago in Jameel v Wall Street Journal ([2006] UKHL 44). [read post]
