Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 1581 - 1600 of 21,678
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To take one example, at the time that the Court decided the leading qualified immunity case of Harlow v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 4:39 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Conclusory allegations of damages or injuries predicated on speculation cannot suffice for a malpractice action, and dismissal is warranted where the allegations in the complaint are merely conclusory and speculative” (Denisco v Uysal, 195 AD3d 989, 991 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Katie Hobbs is seeking a review of what her office alleges was “likely unethical conduct” by the state’s former attorney general, Mark Brnovich. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am by Holly
Prudential, a global insurance company, trademarked PRU and other PRU-formative marks in the United States and other countries (but not China) in 2002. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 9:01 am by Jen Patja Howell
Scott hearkened back to object lessons of yesteryear to mark the release of two new comedies that have literally been decades in the making: Party Down and A History of the World, Part 2. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Nedim Malovic
Neither trade mark covered digital assets.The French fashion house sued Hermés for trade mark infringement, essentially referring to a risk of confusion for consumers, as well as trade mark dilution and cybersquatting.Defendant Rothschild mainly centred his counterarguments on the Roger test (as established in 1989 case Rogers v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:41 am by Michael Caruso
By Michael CarusoBecause David’s readers are the most informed in the district, you know that this year marks the 60th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Gideon v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
With this history in mind, along with (i) foundational principles of state judicial practice and (ii) the shortcomings of the United States Supreme Court’s approach to fractured opinions in Marks v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:09 am
"] March 14, 2023 - 10:30 AM [In-person]: Audemas Piquet Holding S.A. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 1:09 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[v] That still leaves open the question of the funding of the defence of the derivative claim. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
[About the same as other rifles] Several federal and state courts are relitigating the constitutionality of "assault weapon" bans after the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by INFORRM
United States On 21 February 2023, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]