Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 13,228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2007, 3:45 pm
MSRP policies are lawful under United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:46 am
In support of this, he cited the view of Mr Justice Colman in Navigas v Enron. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 6:43 pm
Ronwin); and (3) a board controlled by attorneys prohibits attorney advertising and deters attorneys from engaging in price competition (Bates v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 1:17 pm
("CREI") (previously known as Cole Credit Property Trust III ("CCPT III") is a non-traded real estate investment trust that owns real estate throughout the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:10 am
Briefly: At Balkinization, Zach Price weighs in on Puerto Rico v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:42 am
Dependable Sales & Service, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 2:45 am
SES is the registered proprietor of the EP 3883277 (EP 277), which relates to the spatial arrangement of components within electronic shelf labels that display price information in sales areas. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 5:25 pm
Federal/State Tensions – The April 16 Orders Immediate Effect on ISO/RTO Markets The April 16 Orders exacerbate a tension between federal policy/jurisdiction regarding capacity pricing and state policies/jurisdiction associated with capacity procurement. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 12:09 pm
and Fegley v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:14 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 6:57 am
The medical association's motion maintains that the suit, filed in April by egg donor Lindsay Kamakahi, fails to state a claim under antitrust law because it does not contest the basic rationale for the price limits, which were imposed to address ethical concerns. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:19 am
Phillips v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:30 pm
For example, the Commissioner cites United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 2:34 pm
See also Kraus v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:13 pm
By Jason Rantanen VirnetX, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:42 am
The Court reversed a lower court decision and found that a family of California raisin growers deserved just compensation after the state impounded parts of their crops in a price-support program. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 5:47 am
In a decision issued on April 21, 2008, Bell BCI Company v, United States, the United States Court of Federal Claims issued a decision that can only be described as a “slam dunk” for the contractor. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:55 am
In the opening brief in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
In Huppe v. [read post]
