Search for: "State v. Quick" Results 1581 - 1600 of 4,925
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2017, 11:55 am by Isaac
 Kenya's Competition Act 2010, section 55(a)(v), prohibits false representations that "goods or services have sponsorship, approval, performance characteristics, accessories, uses or benefits they do not have. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:48 pm by Jarod Bona
FTC More recently, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
”As Gelwan was not a party in the federal action ( Gelmin v Quicke, 224 AD2d 481 [2d Dept 1996] [“party” refers to party in action]), and as the alleged misconduct occurred during the federal action and not here ( Chibcha Rest., Inc. v David A. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] No. 07-5439 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 6:26 pm by Jason Rantanen
  Both federal and state lawmakers have criticized patent owners who send demand letters to multiple alleged infringers looking for quick settlements. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:02 am by Eric
It has hundreds of thousands of customers in the state and earns millions of dollars in revenue from the state each year. [read post]
5 May 2023, 8:47 am by Eric Goldman
Martono * 2H 2020 Quick Links, Part 4 (FOSTA) * Justice Thomas’ Anti-Section 230 Statement Doesn’t Support Reconsideration–JB v. [read post]