Search for: "State v. Stevens"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 7,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2009, 6:59 am
United States, and now Harbison v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 10:26 am
Strange as a defendant, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.Plaintiffs were not required to submit an affidavit of merit or make any other evidentiary showing in support of their motion (see Berkeley Research Group, LLC v FTI Consulting, Inc., 157 AD3d 486, 490, 69 N.Y.S.3d 26 [1st Dept 2018]; Hickey v Steven E. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 12:56 pm
Facts: This case (Metro Sales, Inc v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 5:35 am
Not content to widen doctrines on the margins, Justice Stevens' majority opinion blazed a new path through the law of standing and unearthed newfound regulatory authority for the United States Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 9:08 am
In Hein v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:19 am
In other big First Amendment news this week, the Court decided United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 4:06 pm
The application was 06A678, Coalition to Defender Affirmative Action, et al., v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Jianlin Chen, Deconstructing the Religious Free Market, (3 Journal of Law, Religion and State 1-24 (2014)).Russell G. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 10:32 am
ROBERTS v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:00 pm
National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates, here. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 8:12 am
Hodges, holding that states must license marriages between same-sex couples, continues to spawn coverage and commentary. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:05 am
And Justice John Paul Stevens delivered the opinion of the Court in Carachuri-Rosendo v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:41 pm
Arguing Counsel Steven A. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 4:29 am
” At In a Crowded Theater, Erica Goldberg considers the free-exercise arguments put forward by the petitioners in the case, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 8:53 am
From Miner v. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Stevens, No. 2008 U.S. [read post]
16 May 2013, 7:14 am
While the Supreme Court has done away with the "useful, concrete and tangible result" test from State Street Bank v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:23 am
In Schweiker v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 8:37 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Steven Reece v. [read post]
