Search for: "State v. White" Results 1581 - 1600 of 11,795
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2018, 10:08 am by Eugene Volokh
White, 560 S.E.2d 420 (2002) (rejecting constitutional challenge by four-to-one vote); Lee v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:26 pm by NARF
(Navajo and Hopi Indian Land Settlement Act of 1974)United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:45 am by Marissa Miller
In the New York Times, Robert Pear reports that Democratic Congressional leaders have filed an amicus brief in Douglas v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:07 am by Eugene Volokh
New York's efforts to punish the National Rifle Association, at issue before the Supreme Court in National Rifle Association v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 6:38 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
"  At the sixth trial, the state "engaged in dramatically disparate questioning of black and white prospective jurors" and it "then struck at least one black prospective juror, . . . who was similarly situated to white prospective jurors who were not struck by the State"Under Supreme Court precedent, the Equal Protection Clause is violated when prospective black jurors are excluded from sitting on the case because of their race. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:30 am
Practice Tip: The United States Supreme Court addressed the elements required for trade dress to be protected in Two Pesos, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Taken together, the chapters trace the narrative arc of school desegregation in the United States, beginning in California in the 1940s, continuing through Brown v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 3:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here's the full context, from White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre yesterday: Q But specifically with regards to limiting these freedoms — I guess my question is: The Supreme Court created this space for the anti-abortion movement at the state level and also perhaps at the federal level to try and restrict this freedom. [read post]