Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 40,639
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
Chubin et al. at 10, Daubert v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 8:56 am
Rose Hughes discussed the recently proposed changes in the admission requirements for the European Patent attorney qualifying examinations, by considering also the related “strongly worded response” by CIPA.Image via PexelsKatfriend Mindia Davitadze commented on the fact that Georgia recently became the 5th validating state to the European Patents Organisation by signing the Validation Agreement and promising to bolster the protection of intellectual property… [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 3:46 am
” Part V will respond to recent academic arguments suggesting that the President is an “officer of the United States” for purposes of Section 3. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:07 am
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 1:38 pm
Over a dissent, the Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 10:05 am
Some preliminary data on imports of EVs into EU The import statistics between 2020-2023[v] do show a certain increasing trend of imports of new EVs from China into EU. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 9:21 am
[I agree with some of the literal words in this passage–government censorship is terrible and the First Amendment is really important. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
Judge Emmons charged the grand jury that “[t]he oath which shall have been taken need not be in the precise words of the amendment” “To support the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
” In NAACP v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
In Trek Bicycle Corp. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 10:04 am
In L.C.C. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 8:44 am
GmbH v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 8:44 am
GmbH v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 8:33 am
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit’s new decision in Medtronic v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 7:36 am
” In other words, after the US Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Perez v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:31 am
’ In other words, either Arbitrator, not either party, may go to a New York court. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
[are] not within the scope of [an individual's] employment and [do] not advance the [State's] interests", citing Town of Somers v Titan Indem. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
[are] not within the scope of [an individual's] employment and [do] not advance the [State's] interests", citing Town of Somers v Titan Indem. [read post]
