Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 1581 - 1600 of 4,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2018, 12:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  I understand the impulse to protect against vague disparagement, but it is worth noting that the court doesn’t ask very much about what factual message exactly consumers will take away.] [read post]
We don’t create a class of outcasts preemptively precluded from seeking the protection of the law. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:17 am by Eric Goldman
So now the case will consume more litigation cycles only to end up in the same place. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:20 am by Jeff Welty
” In other words, a sign “is evidence of the homeowner’s intent that the [area protected by the sign is] not open to the public. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
NCLC attorney and now-former Consumer Advisory Board member Chi Chi Wu criticized the move as weakening “critical consumer financial protections that help average families. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Finally, the warnings weren’t so unduly burdensome as to chill protected speech. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:30 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer
The GDPR enforcement regime is made up of a network of authorities from the Data Protection Officers within companies, boiling up to the national Supervisory Authorities, and ultimately the European Data Protection Board. [read post]
24 May 2018, 10:50 pm
It was held in T-136/11 Pelicantravel.com sro v OHIM that such a practice “may” constitute bad faith. [read post]
24 May 2018, 1:14 pm
Seuss-Star Trek mash-up parody book entitled “Oh, the Places You’ll Boldly Go! [read post]
However, the challenges of GDPR certainly don’t end on the date this law goes into implementation. [read post]