Search for: "THE COMMERCE INSURANCE COMPANY" Results 1581 - 1600 of 2,350
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2011, 5:08 pm by Michael H. Cohen
  Whether advising start-ups or established companies, he brings his entrepreneurial spirit and caring insight to cutting-edge legal and regulatory challenges. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 1:59 pm by Michael H. Cohen
  Whether advising start-ups or established companies, he brings his entrepreneurial spirit and caring insight to cutting-edge legal and regulatory challenges. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:09 pm by Michael H. Cohen
  Whether advising start-ups or established companies, he brings his entrepreneurial spirit and caring insight to cutting-edge legal and regulatory challenges. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 8:58 am by Lovechilde
  At that time, he concurred with Paulson on the wisdom of bailing out the insurance giant AIG and not rescuing Lehman Brothers. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 2:59 am
The primary goal of the Act was to protect the health and safety of the public by preventing deleterious, adulterated or misbranded articles from entering interstate commerce. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
United StatesCourt: U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-50354 Opinion Date: August 16, 2011 Judge: Elrod Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Injury Law, Insurance Law Plaintiffs filed suit in district court against the United States, alleging negligence in record-keeping and the administration of a certain life insurance policy. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 12:00 am by Ilya Somin
 The federal government argues that requiring people to purchase health insurance is needed to ensure that people won’t wait to get insured until after they get sick, something they may be encouraged to do because the health care bill forbids insurance companies from turning away customers with preexisting conditions. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:13 pm by Goldberg Segalla LLP
The 11th Circuit decision, decided by a divided three person panel, held that “the individual mandate contained in the Act exceeds Congress’s enumerated commerce power”:  “What Congress cannot do under the Commerce Clause is mandate that individuals enter into contracts with private insurance companies for the purchase of an expensive product from the time they are born until the time they die. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:25 pm
  Whether advising start-ups or established companies, he brings his entrepreneurial spirit and caring insight to cutting-edge legal and regulatory challenges. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 11:53 am by Jason Neufeld
The sad reality is that the doctor’s insurance company, which otherwise would have covered Colin’s medical needs for the rest of his life, simply shifted that burden onto the American taxpayer. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:52 am by Larry Tribe Guest
  According to the Eleventh Circuit, the decision to forgo health insurance is “noneconomic” because it is “defined by the absence of . . . commerce. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 9:28 am by Neil S. Siegel
  It is interstate in scope primarily because of the operation of many insurance companies in multiple states, the phenomenon of cross-state hospital use, and the interstate migration (or immobility) of insurance companies and individuals in partial response to the existence of different state health care regimes. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 8:51 am by Lovechilde
“But what Congress cannot do under the Commerce Clause is mandate that individuals enter into contracts with private insurance companies for the purchase of an expensive product from the time they are born until the time they die. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 4:13 pm by Orin Kerr
The uninsured and the individual mandate also do not prevent insurance companies’ regulatory compliance with the Act’s insurance reforms. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 2:29 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Additionally, all these mandates involve a citizen directly interacting with the government, whereas the individual mandate requires an individual to enter into a compulsory contract with a private company. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 6:45 pm by Barry Barnett
We . . . refuse to abdicate our constitutional duty when Congress has acted beyond its enumerated Commerce Clause power in mandating that Americans, from cradle to grave, purchase an insurance product from a private company. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm
The NYT reports: "What Congress cannot do under the Commerce Clause is mandate that individuals enter into contracts with private insurance companies for the purchase of an expensive product from the time they are born until the time they die," the opinion said.... [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:06 pm by Paul A. Prados
  The Court also indicates that striking the individual mandate will not hinder the ability of Congress to regulate insurance companies. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 11:37 am by Lyle Denniston
Its finding that the insurance mandate was not within the Commerce power began on page 100 of the majority opinion. [read post]