Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Scales"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 2,797
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2015, 2:29 pm
Stamer’s legal and management consulting work throughout her 27 plus year career has focused on helping organizations and their management use the law and process to manage people, process, compliance, operations and risk. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 6:41 am
Guatemala and the “Mapiripán Massacre” v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 6:41 am
Guatemala and the “Mapiripán Massacre” v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 11:42 am
Grade V. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
This is what Roland has to say:In June, CJEU Advocate General Wathelet issued his opinion in Nestlé v Cadbury (Case C-215/14 [noted by the IPKat here].The perceived wisdom has since been that Nestlé's Kit Kat shape (left) must necessarily be unregistrable as a trade mark. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:10 pm
In the new legal context adherence to the limits set by Dingle was perhaps more likely to hold the scales evenly between the parties than it did in the past [86]. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm
Employer and other sponsors of non-grandfathered group health plans, their insurers, administrators and fiduciaries should adjust the co-payment, deductible and out of pocket limits applicable for the 2015 plan year to reflect the recent adjustment in the out-of-pocket limits on essential benefits allowed by that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) § 1302(c)(1). [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:05 am
Stamer’s legal and management consulting work throughout her 27 plus year career has focused on helping organizations and their management use the law and process to manage people, process, compliance, operations and risk. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:56 am
Employers sponsoring group health plan coverage now or in 2014, check the adequacy of your insurer or third party administrator’s claims and appeals processes and notices. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 6:44 am
The Court of Appeals says Yes.The case is Briggs v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
Very few projects dedicated to funding different types of access/public domain; those projects tend to be small scale. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:35 pm
First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 7:10 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 7:10 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 2:14 pm
The heavy reliance by group health plans and health insurers upon internet based applications and portals to carry out online enrollment, claims administration and payment, reporting and a host of other key health plan functions makes it particularly important for health plans, their employer or other sponsors, fiduciaries, vendors, and other involved in health plan administration or using or accessing health plan data to verify and ensure the internet data sharing and other applications and portals… [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Even if rarely invoked, the section has a disciplinary effect: it is not about punishment, which cannot address large-scale fraud even as contemplated under section 365. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 7:17 am
(The court cites the 2011 CJ Products v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 8:33 am
It was shaken to the core, so shaken actually that it forced scales off their resting place onto a one Mrs. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 8:33 am
It was shaken to the core, so shaken actually that it forced scales off their resting place onto a one Mrs. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:24 am
The Sofa Workshop Ltd v Sofaworks Ltd [2015] EWHC 1773 (IPEC), a 29 June decision of Judge Richard Hacon in the increasingly impressive and cost-effective Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales, is impressive not only in its length (123 paragraphs) but also for the fact that the court was able to deal with so many legal and evidential issues in just two hearing days. [read post]
