Search for: "UNKNOWN PERSONS AND INTERESTED PARTIES"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 1,819
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2010, 3:08 pm
As Eady J said in X & Y v Persons Unknown[2006] EWHC 2783 (QB), [2007] EMLR 290 at para 72: “…the Spycatcher doctrine [Attorney-General v Newspaper Publishing Plc [1988] Ch 333 at 375, 380] would go on inhibiting third parties from publishing the relevant information notionally pending a trial which would never actually take place. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm
“Personal jurisdiction” is the phrase given to the collection of questions that arise when a party asks, “What the heck am I doing before this court? [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 7:16 am
[effecting] a sundering the most vital connections that one person can feel for another in a community of shared moral interest” (218). [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 5:52 pm
Persons Unknown [2010] EMLR 16. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:20 pm
It is purely to set the record straight, and is intended only for those that are interested. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
There are many unknowns in this nascent field that undoubtedly will be fleshed out over time. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 4:18 am
In this case (unlike the decision in Terry v Persons Unknown), the claimant denied the allegations of an extra-marital affair and further filed evidence that the Defendant was seeking to blackmail him. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:34 pm
Many years ago when we first started to practice law, we read an interesting statistic that in California. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:54 am
Morgan J held that Collins himself was not a party to any contracts with the BBC, the contracts in question having been agreed between the Corporation and a company established to service Collins’ business interests (para.20). [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 2:00 am
” Note: the views expressed are my personal and with great respect to courts. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:30 pm
The White House specifically and the Democratic Party more generally feel an urgent need to recapture some momentum to put their domestic agenda on track. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 1:45 pm
It is unknown if it is even available for inspection. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 5:54 pm
It will be interesting to see whether there is a reference to the Grand Chamber. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:21 am
The purpose of discovery is, of course, to find out what the actual facts are, so that neither an opponent nor the court will have to depend upon a party’s self interested, unplumbed claims of what the facts are. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:40 am
As such, this niche publication would appeal mostly to U.S. copyright lawyers with an international practice or with a strong interest in copyright legislation, Canadian and U.K. copyright attorneys, and authors or other persons with a personal interest in this aspect of copyright. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm
There’s a ConstitutionDay.com website (by parties unknown), “recognizing all who, are born in the U.S. or by naturalization, have become citizens. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm
At this point, just days after an accident, the extent of her injuries are unknown. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 7:10 am
It cited to a number of cases that supported this holding, each of which had found that a person loses his or her expectation of privacy in information when that information is disclosed to a third party. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:41 am
The Administrative Court ruled in favour of Logistep, weighing the interest in enforcement of IP rights more than the privacy interest of the users. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 4:11 am
There has to be a fair dealing between the parties and the financing companies/institutions are not free to ignore performance of their obligation as a party to the contract. [read post]
