Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 51,335
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 3:25 am
Billy Stott v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:52 am
In 2019 there were complaints about his conduct, including what was said to be his use of antisemitic language. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:11 pm
On 1 February 2024, Mrs Justice Steyn handed down judgment in Trump v Orbis Business Intelligence Limited [2024] EWHC 13 (KB) – denying the former US President’s amendment application and granting Orbis’s strike out / summary judgment application over the remainder of the claim. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
Even apart from that fundamental flaw, however, this first “off-ramp” argument wouldn’t withstand scrutiny on its own terms, even if this were a case (again: it’s not) where a state were purporting to “enforce” Section 3 by, for example, refusing to allow the winner of an election to enter into state office because she’s disqualified under Section 3, or using a state-law-sanctioned cause of action to remove such a person from the… [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:54 pm
An excerpt from today's Appellate Court of Connecticut decision in Ambrose v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Grp., LLC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 11:19 am
(It is likely that Judge Chutkan will use the same period of time, though she may choose a shorter schedule this second time around.) [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 11:04 am
Supreme Court in the Macquarie Infrastructure Corporation v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 9:18 am
Circuit Court's opinion in US v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am
Link: Listen to Live Arguments at the Court The case, Trump v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
Contact us today online or by telephone at 519-821-5465 to arrange a confidential consultation. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
Contact us today online or by telephone at 519-821-5465 to arrange a confidential consultation. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
Similarly, in SRB v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:21 pm
Class V. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 2:13 pm
In the landmark case Carpenter v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:59 am
Trump v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:08 am
In the past, the WCAB used the same legal template to analyze both sets of scenarios. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:08 am
Graham v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
That brings us back to the courts. [read post]
