Search for: "US v. Harris"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 4,946
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2014, 5:18 am
See Harris v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:05 am
The case, Margot Bergensen v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 1:54 am
Sep 27, 2007) (NO. 1570)Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, New York (Matthew M. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Harris, Attorneys General, David S. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 9:21 am
Pennsylvania and Harris v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:24 am
Harris Associates and Merck v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:51 am
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
App. 1988); Harris v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
The suit, Texas Democratic Party et al v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 4:32 pm
Shane Harris guest-hosted the Lawfare Podcast and interviewed Ben about Lawfare’s history and its transition its new online home: Probably to give us a chance to show off the new site's features, the Supreme Court chose Monday to release its decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 12:46 am
People v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:24 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: Temodar (Temozolomide) – US: District Court Delaware: Temador patent unenforceable due to prosecution laches and inequitable conduct: Cancer Research Tech v Barr Labs (Docket Report) (Patent Baristas) (IP Factor) Mirapex (Pramipexole) – US: CAFC: The metes and bounds of obviousness-type double… [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 6:51 am
The point of departure in the argument in Egbert v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:32 pm
Harris is not a watershed development in the theory of racial gerrymandering. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 1:43 pm
Harris Assocs. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
Section 1692e(10) prohibits "using false representations or deceptive means to collect or attempt to collect any debt or to obtain information concerning a consumer. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:44 am
United States v Powell, 469 US 57, 63 [1984], citing Harris v Rivera, 454 US 339, 346 [1981] [a jury has the "unreviewable power . . . to return a verdict of not guilty for impermissible reasons"]). [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Radiodetection – ITC institutes investigation (337-TA-727) regarding certain underground cable and pipe locators (ITC Law Blog) US Copyright Bill H.R. 5704 would curb access to Government works (Public Knowledge) Copyright termination: How authors can reclaim their copyrights (IP Osgoode) US Copyright – Decisions Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals guts ‘first sale’: Costco… [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
” There are few recent decisions where this is exemplified better than in the journalistic fallout from Daniels v. [read post]
