Search for: "US v. London"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 3,704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2012, 4:15 pm
Erith is in the London Borough of Bexleyheath and is about 18 miles by road from this office. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 4:15 pm
Erith is in the London Borough of Bexleyheath and is about 18 miles by road from this office. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 6:30 am
Crisis and Shelter are intervening in today’s cases: Hotak v London Borough of Southwark, Johnson v Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council, Kanu v London Borough of Southwark. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 12:19 pm
This Kat learns that the English language versions of Advocate General Bot’s Opinions in Cases C-146/13 Kingdom of Spain v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and C-147/13 Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union were finally made publicly available last Thursday. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 3:40 pm
April 29, 2014) -- in which the US Supreme Court has doubtless endeared itself to many of our readers by making it easier for US courts to award patent attorney fees. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:40 am
A chivalrous mention goes to Howard Knopf (Excess Copyright), for telling us upon whom he would like to bestow his prize, if he were to win, as a token of his gentlemanly esteem.Bottom line. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:38 pm
Agent for Flechtheim)(Alex Vömel, Dusseldorf. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 4:11 am
He rejected the Appellant’s submission based on Prudential Assurance v The London Residual Body H.L. [1992] 2 AC 386 that the tenancy was a periodic tenancy terminable on that basis and that any provision which purported to vary that would mean that the lease was of an uncertain duration and would therefore be void. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 2:43 am
Mr Munro, who is giving evidence during the latest stage of the High Court trial in London of Sir Cliff’s claim against the BBC for invasion of his privacy, outlined his thoughts in a written witness statement. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am
Please send us any items for inclusion in the next round up to inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 4:41 pm
I submit that, if nothing else, Northern Ireland’s singular opposition to the principle has taught us that much about s 1. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 6:17 am
Almost exactly a year ago we posted a blog on the High Court case of London Tara Hotel Limited v Kensington Close Hotel Limited, where it was decided that a personal licence to use a roadway granted to the previous owner of the Kensington Close Hotel did not prevent the current owner from acquiring an easement based on over 20 years’ continuous use. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Particular care is required before deploying it, as Lord Sales’s analysis in R (Imam) v London Borough of Croydon [2023] UKSC 45 amply demonstrates. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 2:32 pm
Today, many types of projects have been financed by crowd funding such as movies, start-up, civic or educational projects, and even a “cat café” in London. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 1:12 am
Case in point is the incident involving activists from Just Stop Oil, who hurled tomato soup at Vincent van Gogh’s Fifteen Sunflowers (1888) in the National Gallery in London in October 2022. [read post]
4 May 2010, 3:00 pm
New London (20:09), in which the Court held that “New London’s effort to rejuvenate its economy through an integrated development plan qualifies as a public purpose”; Gonzales v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:36 am
However, if you want to engage with us and our writing, we would be really happy and will respond in kind.]Every generation seems to have its great property law case – think about Nat Prov v Ainsworth, Williams & Glyns v Boland, City of London v Flegg, Abbey National v Cann, and the machinations of the litigation which led to RBS v Etridge. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
The bill would also clarify rules for the use of machine-learning technologies and personal data for scientific research. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm
Ofcom has sanctioned London Live, after an interview with conspiracy theorist David Icke that “risked causing significant harm to viewers”. [read post]
