Search for: "United States v. Jones" Results 1581 - 1600 of 3,758
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2021, 2:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Lefkowitz, the text of the decision, DiBattista v County of Westchester,* is set out below:  DiBattista v County of Westchester Decided on July 29, 2008 Supreme Court, Westchester County Carmine DiBattista, ANTHYONY EGIZIACO, KATHERINE JONES, ANTHONY P. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 2:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Lefkowitz, the text of the decision, DiBattista v County of Westchester,* is set out below:  DiBattista v County of Westchester Decided on July 29, 2008 Supreme Court, Westchester County Carmine DiBattista, ANTHYONY EGIZIACO, KATHERINE JONES, ANTHONY P. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  Last year, in State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The case of US v Jones is ostensibly one which turns on the Fourth Amendment (the right against search and seizure). [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:04 pm by Amy Howe
Representing Jones, who was 15 when he committed his crime and is now in his thirties, lawyer David Shapiro told the justices that two of their decisions – a 2012 ruling in Miller v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:39 am
United States and Black v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:13 pm by Jay Stanley
This is particularly unfortunate given that the Supreme Court held earlier this year, in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 3:25 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
According to the National Safety Council, over 2.5 million rear end collisions are reported every year in the United States, making them the most common type of automobile accident. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 6:43 am
United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 122 F.3d 1409, 1415 (Fed. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:07 pm by admin
Today the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am by Eric Goldman
The other referenced tags remind me of what the Ninth Circuit wrote in Perfect 10 v. ccBill (in the copyright context): “When a website traffics in pictures that are titillating by nature, describing photographs as ‘illegal’ or ‘stolen’ may be an attempt to increase their salacious appeal, rather than an admission that the photographs are actually illegal or stolen. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:59 pm
KAHN CLERK [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 07-15329 D.C. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:12 am by Andrew W. Torrance
(U.S. 2012) (previously discussed on LEXVIVO) the United States Supreme Court vacated and remanded the July 29, 2011, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("CAFC") decision, The Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. [read post]